The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
It was a great pity you could not give further quotes from the Judges' Council response to the Home Affairs Select Committee in your edition of 28 March. The quotes given are far more entertaining than anything which has appeared in the Tulkinghorn column for years. We are told the system of monitoring and assessing judicial candidates ensures only the best suited become judges. Your report goes on to say very few systems in the private sector offer anything approaching this degree of "assurance". Assurance for whom? Perhaps the more appropriate term would have been "complacency" or "self-satisfaction".
The biggest laugh of all must be reserved for the suggestion that any alternative system of judicial selection will lead to politicisation. What a terrible thing that would be. Are today's judges politicised? Oh deary me no. We couldn't have that could we? We all know today's judges are brought up and work in a political vacuum. The very idea of a political thought in their lofty minds would instantly die of loneliness. I think not.
Perhaps what the Judges' Council means is that a more open and accountable system would lead to a shift in the nature of the existing politicisation and they are quite happy to keep it the way it is. Fancy that.