Judgment call: 17 September 2012
17 September 2012
9 April 2014
28 August 2014
Police ordered to pay Human Rights Act damages for failure to conduct an adequate investigation into allegations of rape
6 August 2014
31 July 2014
Are post-termination restrictions on a recruitment consultant enforceable where information is widely available on social media?
28 July 2014
The Court of Appeal upheld a determination by Ofcom in respect of a dispute referred by a number of communications providers concerning the charges levied by BT for partial private circuits. BT’s argument, that in assessing its compliance with a costs-orientation condition, its pricing and costs for both the trunk and terminating segments of the circuits had to be aggregated undermined the object of the regulatory regime.
British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications and (1) Cable & Wireless UK (2) Virgin Media Ltd (3) Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd (4) Verizon UK Ltd (5) Colt Technology Services.  EWCA Civ 1051. Rix LJ; Etherton LJ; Lewison LJ. 27 July 2012
For the appellants BT
Monckton Chambers’ Christopher Vajda QC; Fountain Court’s Professor Andrew Burrows QC; Brick Court Chambers’ Sarah Lee; Devereux Chambers’ Ben Lynch; Bird & Bird partner Richard Eccles
For the respondents Ofcom
Blackstone Chambers’ Pushpinder Saini QC; Blackstone Chambers’ James Segan and Blackstone Chambers’ Hanif Mussa instructed directly by Ofcom
For the interveners (1) Cable & Wireless (2) Virgin Media (3) Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications (4) Verizon UK (5) Colt Technology Services.
Blackstone Chambers’ Dinah Rose QC; Blackstone Chambers’ Tristan Jones; Olswang senior associate Ginny O’Flinn
R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.  EWHC 2115 (Admin). Stanley Burnton L. 25 July 2012
In judicial review proceedings brought on behalf of the Chagos Islanders the court exercised its discretion to permit the cross-examination of witnesses in relation to leaked documents likely to have been obtained illegally, as the proceedings could not be fairly or justly determined without resolving the claimant’s allegation based on those documents.
For the claimant R (on the application of Bancoult)
39 Essex Street’s Nigel Pleming QC; 39 Essex Street’s Richard Wald; Clifford Chance consultant Richard Gifford
For the defendant secretary of state
39 Essex Street’s Steven Kovats QC instructed directly by the Treasury Solicitor
Khans Solicitors v Chifuntwe; Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 2108 (QB). Mackay J. 24 July 2012
A compromise as to costs reached between the Secretary of State for the Home Department and the claimant in person after the latter’s solicitors had applied for their costs to be assessed was valid; the principle in Ross v Buxton (1889) LR 42 Ch. D. 190, which had been subsumed into the principle in Margetson and Jones Re  2 Ch. 314, required an intention to cheat before such a compromise could be considered invalid, and it could not be said that either party to the compromise had acted in an underhand manner.
For the appellant Khans Solicitors
12 Old Square’s Michael Biggs instructed directly by Khans Solicitors
For the respondent Chifuntwe
Falcon Chambers’ Oliver Radley-Gardner instructed directly by the Treasury Solicitor
AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd  EWHC 2103 (QB). Nicola Davies J. 25 July 2012
There was an exceptional public interest in the professional and private life of an elected politician such as to justify the publication of a newspaper article claiming that a child had been born as a result of an extramarital affair he had had. However, there was no justification for publishing a photograph of the child, which had been taken covertly when she was less than a year old.
Judgment for claimant in part
For the claimant AAA
5RB’s James Price QC; 5RB’s William Bennett; Collyer Bristow partner Dominic Crossley
For the defendant Associated Newspapers
5RB’s Desmond Browne QC; 5RB’s Alexandra Marzec; Reynolds Porter Chamberlain partner Jaron Lewis
Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW) Aktiengesellschaft v Round & Metal Ltd.  EWHC 2099 (Pat). Arnold J. 27 July 2012
A company had infringed BMW’s community registered designs by importing and selling replica alloy wheels for BMW cars. It could not rely on Regulation 6/2002 art.110 as a defence as, although art.110(1) applied to the market in replacement car parts such as body panels, bumpers and windows, it did not extend to alloy wheels.
Judgment for claimant
For the claimant BMW
11 South Square’s Piers Acland QC; 11 South Square’s Hugo Cuddigan; Mishcon de Reya partner Adam Morallee
For the defendant Round & Metal
8 New Square’s Mark Platts-Mills QC; 8 New Square’s Jonathan Hill; Simons Muirhead & Burton partner Razi Mireskandari
Quick Draw LLP v (1) Global Live Events LLP; (2) Christopher Hunt; (3) Michael Henry; (4) Iambic Media Ltd  EWHC 2105 (Ch). Sarah Asplin QC. 30 July 2012
A limited liability partnership which had provided a bridging loan to finance a concert was entitled to recover the full amount due from the concert organiser. Under the terms of a debenture, the lender was entitled to existing and future copyright in sound and film recordings of the concert as security for the loan.
Judgment for claimant
For the claimant Quick Draw
Maitland Chambers’ Siward Atkins; 8 New Square’s Jonathan Hill; Wiggin solicitor Philip Gorski The second and third defendant appeared in person.
The fourth defendant appeared by its sole director, Global Live Events