The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A decision of Mr Justice Harman has been challenged in the Court of Appeal on the basis of inordinate, unacceptable and inexcusable delay. It has been argued that the judge, who heard the case in question in June and July 1994, failed to give his judgment until 1 April 1996 and that this delay one of the longest on record would have, inter alia, dimmed his recollection of witnesses. It is also claimed that he mislaid case papers. Appeal judges Lords Justices Gibson, Brooke and Mummery were told during the appeal that letters were written to Judge Harman as the delay went on urging him to give his judgment and that the Vice Chancellor had also been contacted. Because of the delay consideration was also being given to taking out life insurance on the judge to cover lost legal costs if he died before giving his ruling.