Noteholder not disenfranchised from voting on a restructuring - .PDF file.
The issue was whether certain commercial-mortgage-backed notes were disenfranchised from voting, pursuant to the interpretation of two trust deeds.
The relevant trust deeds stated, in essence, that a ‘Seller’ was disenfranchised for certain voting purposes. The question arose as to whether Barclays, which was one of the Banks defined as a ‘Seller’, was so disenfranchised when it held notes but not in the capacity as Seller.
Practically, Barclays had never (and indeed would not) held the notes as a ‘Seller’. It argued this point to the conclusion that the capacity in which the notes were held was irrelevant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.