Case law update: Pitt v HMRC and Futter v HMRC

Download document:

Case law update: Futter and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and Pitt and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) - .PDF file.

On 9 May 2013, the Supreme Court published its judgment in the combined cases of Futter and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and Pitt and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (Pitt v HMRC and Futter v HMRC). The case is significant for trustees and advisers (and their insurers) because it confirms the limits of the Hastings-Bass rule, as set out in the judgment of Lloyd J in the Court of Appeal, which had been used for many years by trustees to set aside decisions that had brought about unplanned tax charges.

A link to our article on the Court of Appeal judgment in the July 2011 edition of Pensions Pieces is set out below. That article includes a description of the Hastings-Bass rule, as stated by Lloyd J (as he then was) in Sieff v Fox

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.