Game-changing result for the real-estate sector in the Court of Appeal — 24 February 2014

Download document:

Game-changing result for the real-estate sector in the Court of Appeal — 24 February 2014 - .PDF file.

Landlords have won their appeal, in the case surrounding the Game administration, to claim unpaid rent for a period that a company is in administration and trading from a property as an expense of the administration (as opposed to merely a provable debt), irrespective of when the due date for rent payment occurs.

Two high court decisions (Goldacre and Luminar) had decided that where rent is payable in advance and an administrator/liquidator is appointed:

  • If the relevant quarter payment day fell prior to the appointment, then none of that quarter’s rent could be an expense of the administration/winding-up during that quarter, even if the property was used for the purposes of the administration/winding-up during that period. This left that quarter’s rent to rank as a provable debt alongside other unsecured creditors.
  • If the relevant quarter payment day fell after the appointment, then the whole quarter’s rent could be an expense of the administration/winding-up, even where it was not used for the purposes of the administration/winding-up for the whole quarter…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.