Irwin Mitchell, Hodge Jones & Allen face negligence claim over MMR case By Sam Chadderton 6 September 2012 13:21 17 December 2015 12:30 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 6 September 2012 at 21:36 The case against the MMR vaccine and Autism has NOT been disproved. Legal Services Commission withdrew funding which stopped us from having our day in court. Reply Link Michael Boult 7 September 2012 at 09:25 My daughter suffered serious damage from mmr vaccine, the legal aid was withdrawn,even our judge said we should have had the case heard, the case was suspiciously handled with all the changes of legal representation. We still fight for justice, my child is now 18. Reply Link Anonymous 7 September 2012 at 11:04 It’s not really a day in court issue, it’s an issue of what the taxpayer should pay for. The doctor who suggested the link was shown to have fraudulently invented the evidence. While there’s absolutely no problem if private parties want to spend their own money to have a day in court, it would be a poor use of taxpayer’s money. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.