The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A trio of New York firms have scooped roles advising on the $3.5bn (£1.9bn) litigation filed against World Trade Center insurers yesterday.
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom insurance partner Timothy Reynolds is advising the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) alongside Wachtell Lipton’s Marc Wolinsky, acting for developer Larry Silverstein, in the lawsuit.
The PANYNJ and Silverstein are seeking payment from seven insurance companies who refuse to pay property insurance claims because the original development plan for the World Trade Center site has been changed.
In the claim, filed in New York yesterday (26 June), the claimants say that the redevelopment plan depends on the insurance money being paid.
The insurers facing the lawsuit are Allianz, Industrial Risk Insurers, Travelers Indemnity, Royal Indemnity Company, Gulf Insurance, Zurich American Insurance and Employers Insurance of Wasau.
Silverstein entered into a lease agreement with the PANYNJ in July 2001, giving him the right to rebuild the site following its destruction in the September 11 terrorist attacks.
Allianz, which is instructing Minneapolis firm Zelle Hofmann Voebel Mason & Gette, said in a statement: “Allianz views the new state court suit as unnecessary because it selectively addresses only one of many issues between the parties. This one issue and many others are already part of a comprehensive federal lawsuit that has been actively proceeding for nearly five years. Allianz is eager for a judicial resolution of this matter in the proper forum.”