NHSLA unveils revamped £400m panel

  • Print
  • Comments (10)

Readers' comments (10)

  • seems to be the first panel of the year that doesn't include Bond Dickinson. They've been cleaning up in these panels.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous on 3 July at 12:09pm clearly works for Bond Dickinson! Not great for Bond Dickinson that their competitiors Ward Hadaway got on the panel......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm confused. Is this for the patient's benefit or to protect the "professionals"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous at 1:39pm. As far as I am aware, Bond Dickinson doesn't have a clinical negligence practice so not sure on the relevance of the Ward Hadaway comment...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You are living in the past. Legacy firm, Dickinson Dees used to compete against Ward Hadaway for work.

    New firm, Bond Dickinson's natural competitors are Freshfields, Linklaters, DLA Piper and Slaughter & May.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Fact: we can provide a service that is equal to or better than most major City of London law firms" (Dickinson Dees website, 2005)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How has a news story about healthcare legal panels, where Bond Dickinson isn't even considered to be a specialist, suddenly turned into a discussion about that firm's merits or lack thereof? No doubt people at BD think the world revolves around them, but the rest of us probably take a more balanced perspective.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I do think we should just let Bond Dickinson get on with it and end this pathetically pointless sniping. It doesn't reflect well on those who make these kinds of comments about any firm.

    You might as well name these comment sections "moan about X law firm here".

    How childish.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • we should be discussing if as tax payers are we getting value for money ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It looks to me as if these comments exclusively praise Bond Dickinson. They're not involved in this panel, but the first comment was saying that this is unusual given their success in getting on to panels this year.

    Simply because a panel doesn't include Bond Dickinson does not automatically mean the tax payer isn't getting value for money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (10)