Categories:West Midlands

Honesty’s the best redundancy policy

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

Readers' comments (5)

  • Are you sure honesty is the best policy here?

    This is a bit like saying a recession is a good and cathartic thing... For those who were given their marching orders in performance reviews at the start of this year they have had time to find another job, and without the stigma of redundancy hanging over them (after all, you don't make good people redundant). Now the market has tanked and there are no jobs to be had. So being made redundant now might sound 'fairer' but is likely to result in a much worse outcome for the indvidual. I know which I'd prefer!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Preserving profits drives the redundancy policy

    The big difference is that there is much more pressure now on the management of law firms to preserve profitability by whatever means they can. In a down-turn, the first to go must be the most expensive liabilities - the staff.
    In the "good old days" big firms were less profit-driven and were prepared to hang on to their staff having made the investment of training them.

    Of course, these redundancies will cost the firms double when they have to go out and hire again in a year's time.

    Another factor is the way the legal market works - if lawyers didn't expect 90-100% of their earnings to come from salary, they would represent a much lower risk to firms.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Honesty's the best redundancy policy

    Beginning an article about redundancies in the legal profession with a bald statement that exactly 569 people have been made redundant to date displays naivety and insensitivity in the extreme. There are something like 9,500 odd firms of solicitors in England and Wales and you think that only 569 people have been made redundant?

    Perish the thought that you should have to think about people that work in a high street, or even, horror of horrors, unqualified lawyers and paralegals.

    I suggest that you either 'get real' and do some sensible research or rename your publication 'The Silver Circle Lawyer' and be honest about whom you want to actually read it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Missing the point Christopher Gough?

    The Lawyer produces the UK200 each year as this is it's target market Christopher. The Lawyer is perfectly within it's rights to review redundancies in the top 200 firms on this basis therefore surely? Your comments seem to be wide of the mark. Perhaps the Gazette would be more appropriate reading material for the high street practice news?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are you sure honesty is the best policy here?
    personal injury lawyer --personal injury lawyer

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (5)