Holman Fenwick Willan’s Sydney head David Coogans is moving to Hong Kong to join Howse Williams Bowers, a firm established earlier this year by three of Reed Smith Richards Butler’s founding partners in Hong Kong.
Coogans, a shipping lawyer with a focus on collision and salvage work, will join his former Richards Butler colleagues in Hong Kong. He joined Richards Butler Hong Kong in 1989 and became a partner at Richards Butler Hong Kong in 1994. In 2004, he moved to Australia to work in the shipping industry and joined Holman Fenwick’s Sydney office in 2011.
Howse Williams Bowers (HWB), was established on 1 January 2012 when a group of 50 staff including 15 lawyers, led by partners Chris Howse, Chris Williams and Kevin Bowers, resigned from the Hong Kong office of Reed Smith Richards Butler (previously Richards Butler Hong Kong) in order to set up the new firm (9 January 2012).
In addition to Coogans, who will start later this year, HWB has also taken on a seven-member family and matrimonial practice headed by partner Linda Heathfield. The team joins from Hong Kong family law boutique Ip & Heathfield, and they will bring all their clients to the new firm. Heathfield is also a Richards Butler Hong Kong alumna, having worked at the firm in the 1980s.
“The PI clubs we work for want us to have wet work capability. David’s industry knowledge and ability can fill the missing piece of the jigsaw in our shipping practice,” said Howse, managing partner of HWB. “It’s great to be able to work together again with our former colleagues David and Linda.”
The latest recruitment has pushed HWB’s total staff headcount to 70, including eight partners.
Readers' comments (7)
Don | 4-Sep-2012 3:07 pm
Now Clyde & Co is in Australia too, Holman Fenwick will face more competition down under.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 5-Sep-2012 3:23 am
"Heathfield is also a Richards Butler alumni"
No, she's a Richards Butler alumnA. Alumni is the plural. See this all the time, drives me mad. Can't any lawyers speak Latin any more?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
James Fairweather | 5-Sep-2012 9:49 am
As we're on a pedantic kick, Anon, it should be noted that alumni is in fact the plural of the masculine singular noun alumnus. Alumna is the singular form of alumnae (feminine plural).
The rest of your point was fair enough, mind.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
To Anonymous | 5-Sep-2012 10:30 am
It's alumnus not alumnA. If you have to make this kind of post please do your spell check before clicking the submit button.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Joanne Harris | 5-Sep-2012 10:40 am
Thanks for the Latin corrections, everyone - our erroneous "alumni" has now been changed to the correct "alumna".
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 5-Sep-2012 12:11 pm
Dear Anon @ 3:32, boreus offus
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Caecilius Est-Pater | 11-Sep-2012 2:33 pm
I had thought that "alumna" and "alumnae" were not in common usage but then I realised that perhaps [drifts off to sleep].
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment