News Hogan Lovells to rethink name over trademark issues By Margaret Taylor 1 April 2010 09:31 17 December 2015 16:08 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Mike 1 April 2010 at 10:00 So who would go to Lovells for IP advice then? Reply Link Me 1 April 2010 at 10:10 Love Harts. Jack Ennory. Nebraskan truckers. Very amusing! Reply Link Anonymous 1 April 2010 at 10:12 Mike – don’t be a twit. What date it is again? Reply Link Anonymous 1 April 2010 at 10:18 if only it were true. happy 1st april everyone Reply Link Jack Ennory 1 April 2010 at 10:27 To ‘Me’ at 10.10am, if anyone else suggests I am not a real person, I will sue their buck-toothed plum-voiced asses off. You see if I don’t… Reply Link Philip Brund 1 April 2010 at 10:56 Still sounds better than Clifford Chance as a name, even if you name it LoveHogs! I much prefer it to Hogan Lovells anyway…thank god for Nebraskan Truckers! Reply Link Anonymous 1 April 2010 at 11:40 HAPPY APRIL FOOLS! suckers Reply Link DHL 1 April 2010 at 11:56 Jack Ennory – Jackanory, tell a story. Very funny. Reply Link Anonymous 1 April 2010 at 19:03 If only this were true, but I think I’d go for Hogan’s heroes! Reply Link val 6 April 2010 at 23:42 1. this appeared on my australian email after noon on 1 april 2. hence, as I understand the legislation relating to april fools, the person responsible is a fool for 7 years 3. it would be my interpretataion that this penalty would, however, apply only in australia 4 where nobody would notice anyyway Reply Link Anonymous 8 April 2010 at 16:20 And who would go to Mike (post 1) for any advice at all? Reply Link Dirt 12 April 2010 at 12:49 I always thought it was a missed opportunity that the Reed Smith-Richards Butler merger didn’t produce a firm called Reed Richards. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.