The merger between Lovells and Hogan & Hartson will go ahead at the beginning of May after the two firms’ partnerships voted in favour of the union.
Lovells managing partner David Harris (pictured), who will be joint CEO of the new firm along with Hogan chairman Warren Gorrell, said in a statement: “Hogan Lovells presents a compelling proposition to our clients and to the market more generally.
“The new firm will have unrivalled global capability and distinctive strengths in dispute resolution, regulatory, antitrust, corporate, finance, intellectual property and real estate.”
Gorrell added: “Hogan Lovells will have a global presence with high quality practices and geographic depth unmatched in the market, including in the world’s major business and financial centres.
“At the same time, each firm will preserve its shared cultural and core values - collegiality, teamwork, and worldwide leadership in community service.”
Regulatory approval is still required for the new firm, but it is anticipated that it will comprise a US LLP, an International LLP, a Swiss Verein and the various businesses that are affiliated to these structures. Lovells will become part of Hogan’s existing US LLP, which will be rebranded Hogan Lovells, while the reverse will happen in Europe and Asia.
As revealed by The Lawyer last month the combined entity, which will be called Hogan Lovells, will take on Lovells’ corporate governance structure while its pay structure will mirror Hogan’s (16 November 2009).
Under Hogan’s merit-based equity structure 85 per cent of a partner’s remuneration is linked to points that accumulate from the point of making equity partner, while the remainder comes from a bonus pool set aside to reward exceptional performance. The points-linked element, based on areas including billings, client development, pro bono and firm-mindedness, is reviewed biennially, while the bonus is calculated at the end of each financial year.
When the merger goes ahead Lovells partners’ lockstep points will be translated into merit-based points, taking account of lockstep progression. To ensure partners are placed at the right level it will take two years to be fully integrated onto the system, although bonuses will be paid at the end of 2010-11.
While Hogan gets first billing in the enlarged firm’s name, a piece of pre-merger Lovells will live on in the post-merger firm, with its website and all printed literature featuring its green branding (16 November 2009).
Readers' comments (6)
Kevin Wheeler, Wheeler Associates | 15-Dec-2009 3:45 pm
It will be interesting to see if Hogan Lovells is the first of many mergers now in the legal sector. Certainly, if you believe the recent BDO/Jomati survey many more are in the pipeline. The pain that law firms are now facing becasue of the recession will drive many into defensive mergers, principally to reduce costs and protect partner profits. How many will be genuinely strategic like Hogan Lovells? Few, I suspect.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Jonztache | 15-Dec-2009 3:50 pm
Give us a snog!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
mary | 15-Dec-2009 3:59 pm
No surprises here. It all seems to make sense but I guess we'll have to wait for May to see if it's a success or not. It will be interesting to see how the integration goes and the sooner they al move in together the better but that's easier said than done.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Firenbrimstone | 16-Dec-2009 10:29 am
I doubt that this merger will lever either firm to a new 'level' of activity in any of its main jurisdictions. I can't see the addition of Hogan making investment banks any more (or less) likely to recommend/insist on/tolerate the new entity than they do Lovells. Ditto on the other side of the Atlantic.
There may be a few international clients who will see the benefit but again, no step change.
I guess it depends on the definition of success. A new force in international legal services? Doubtful. A sensible union giving both firms access to a broader international footprint? Certainly.
I would say a fair assessment is that this merger is "strategically defensive". Nothing wrong with that, but don't expect miracles.
Oh, and let's open the book on the disappearance of the Lovells name. Two years? Three?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-Dec-2009 1:43 pm
They could have named the new firm "HoLove"...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Mar-2010 11:25 am
As an insider, I can say Firenbrimstone is about right, in my view.
Lovells name may stay for some time.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment