The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Schillings has lost a High Court bid to bring libel proceedings against The Daily Telegraph on behalf of Petra Ecclestone, daughter of Formula 1 tycoon Bernie Ecclestone.
Schillings name partner Keith Schilling instructed One Brick Court’s Manuel Barca to represent the claimant in her action against the newspaper.
Solicitor advocate David Price, name partner at David Price Solicitors & Advocates, represented The Daily Telegraph.
The complaint was brought after the newspaper’s diary column in June this year published comments allegedly made by Ecclestone about Sir Paul McCartney’s call for meat-free Mondays.
She reportedly said: “I’m not a veggie and I don’t have much time for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox.”
Barca was instructed to pursue The Daily Telegraph for damages for libel because the article implied Ecclestone was disrespectful and dismissive of the McCartneys and the singer Annie Lennox to the point of being willing to disparage them publicly for promoting vegetarianism.
Price rejected the claim arguing that the words complained of were incapable of being defamatory to the claimant. Upholding this argument Mrs Justice Sharp said the article would most likely be dismissed by most readers, but “even if read with care I simply do not think it’s capable of lowering the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society”.
She added that whether Ecclestone had made such comments was immaterial, the claim should not be construed as defamation.