Herbert Smith to vote for full financial integration with Freehills
Freehills partners agree to global mobility; Herbert Smith set for modified lockstep as poll result imminent
Freehills Sydney offices
Herbert Smith and Freehills are set for full financial integration if the two firms’ partnerships vote to combine, with the result of the poll widely expected next week.
The proposal of full profit-sharing merger will be seen as a radical move by Herbert Smith as it represents a definitive break with any alliance strategy. Last year it ended its European alliance with German firm Gleiss Lutz and Dutch firm Stibbe following the Continental firms’ decision not to take the decade-long relationship any further.
It is understood that Herbert Smith, which set in motion a review of its lockstep last year as part of Project Blue Sky, is likely to opt for a modified lockstep, much as operated by Freehills. “It’ll be a single economic merger and a single profit pool,” said a source.
Other details of the deal between Herbert Smith and Freehills include a commitment by Freehills that its partners should be prepared to be mobile across the network - signalling a planned push into China.
Up until now the firms that have combined with Australian practices have opted for arms-length tie-ups. Linklaters will maintain separate profit pools in its agreement with Allens Arthur Robinson (AAR). The two firms have formed a joint venture (JV) bringing together their Asia-focused energy, resources, and infrastructure lawyers and will share revenue on a matter-by-matter basis.
Although Ashurst has entered into a strategic alliance with Blake Dawson with the intention of completing a merger after three years, Norton Rose operates a Verein model with Deacons.
Last year Freehills turned over A$511m, according to Australia’s BRWMagazine.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page
Readers' comments (20)
Anonymous | 22-Jun-2012 4:34 pm
So Freehills partners in beautiful Sydney and Melbourne should be prepared to move to Beijing and Shanghai. Get ready for record high pollution levels, horrific traffic and tainted milk!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 22-Jun-2012 6:42 pm
Dewey Ballantine and Lebouf Lamb merger redux.
Two failing firms merging to try and pretend the can merge their way out of fundamental business problems.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jun-2012 6:03 am
Freehills partners relocated to London? Talk about deja vu - Freehills tried expanding into London and it was as abject a failure as its forays into Asia have all been. Freehills needs Herbies much more than vice versa, notwithstanding the mess Herbies have created around the globe.
Either Freehills sell themselves into this second tier partnership now, or slide inexorably towards third-tier, then fourth-tier, then also-ran as the global elite leave them in the dust. Their Asia presence is already rated fifth tier to unrankable, depending on which league table you pick up.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Deadly Lampshade | 25-Jun-2012 8:08 am
Freehills sole named foreign office Singapore will be the first sacrificial lamb surely!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Jun-2012 10:56 am
No doubt this bright idea will result in still more redundancies within HS - these were clearly enforced with the intention of accommodating Freehills' workforce and that there will be another round of them to make the correct "shape" of the firm ("pearshaped" comes to mind.....)
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Jun-2012 1:00 pm
Still seems a very strange deal: culturally it's all wrong - Freehills are pretty arrogant and they are letting Herbert Smith (who are pretty arrogant) take them over?
They should have look one tier down and merged with someone like Simmons or Camerons and developed a joint-Asia strategy as a combined entity.
Suspect many Freehills partners will regret this.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Jun-2012 1:07 pm
Funny the number of snarky comments here! A couple of questions:
How is a single profit pool going to work given the likely on-going variance in £-A$ exchange rates?
What are the actual PPP *not PEP* numbers for each firm? And in the post-Dewey world, how much net debt does each firm have?
On relocations, why on earth would any Freehills partner move to London in the current market?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Rio | 25-Jun-2012 5:43 pm
Aside from a few top Aussie partners, Herbies is going to turn Freehills and its relatively lower paid staff and junior associate tier into a huge Antipodean outsourcing centre that will make the Belfast workhouse look minuscule.
(That kind of cost benefit aside, this deal still strikes me as quite odd, but think it will go through just to save face).
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Insider | 26-Jun-2012 1:11 pm
I think it's more likely that a spate of London corporate partners will be relocating to the Sydney and Melbourne offices of Freebies. Herbert Smith's way of dealing with underperforming partners is to move them to another office.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jun-2012 2:11 pm
You mean like relocations to Singapore? Dubai? Qatar?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment