Herbert Smith sees PEP return to 2006-07 levels as turnover nudges up
Herbert Smith has posted a 3 per cent increase in turnover and a 7 per cent drop in average profit per equity partner (PEP) for the 2011-12 financial year.
Revenue for the year rose to £480m, up from £465.1m last year, with equity partners enduring a fall in PEP from £900,000 in 2010-11 to £840,000.
The City firm’s net also profit decreased by 7 per cent, from £117.9m to £109.7m - its lowest level in five years, although turnover has reached a five-year peak.
PEP is also at a five-year trough, with the figure now 19 per cent down on the PEP of £1.036m in 2007-08, standing at its lowest level since its £820,000 figure in 2006-07.
The firm’s revenue grew by 3 per cent in 2010-11, with PEP up 4 per cent on the previous year.
The news comes amid a reshaping at the silver circle outfit, with the firm cutting 43.5 jobs in London (12 June 2012) as it enters advanced negotiations over a merger with Australia’s Freehills (21 June 2012).
It has also announced five support-staff redundancies in Dubai (22 May 2012).
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page
Readers' comments (24)
Anonymous | 26-Jun-2012 3:22 pm
Wow. PEP down almost 20% from when David Gold was at the helm. Bring back the Gold Standard!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
read it and weep | 26-Jun-2012 3:25 pm
Scotty did you even read the article? profits are down 7% not 6%
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jun-2012 3:55 pm
Kudos to the partners of Herbert Smith! This shows a real sense of social responsibility with the Herbert Smith partners taking a 7% pay cut and sharing some of the pain with all of the associates and support staff who have been made redundent. Partners at lesser firms would never be so willing to take this kind of pay cut. Good for you noble Herbies!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Magic Man | 26-Jun-2012 4:01 pm
How long before they drop out of the silver circle?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Chippy | 26-Jun-2012 5:30 pm
This ridiculous castigation of a firm at the top of the Bronze Medallion group is pathetic.
Grow up. All of you.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jun-2012 9:48 pm
To the first comment at 12:27 pm. I think is rather the other way around. Same profit divided into less equity partners gives a higher PEP.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 27-Jun-2012 0:04 am
Some of the commentary here is a bit hysterical. Herbert Smith is still one of the finest litigation shops in the world, with an excellent corporate and finance practice. The fact that its got the results it has, with such a poor deal environment (which effects everyone) shows the strength of its disputes group. Everyone needs to settle down and stop making irresponsible comments.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
MW | 28-Jun-2012 12:36 pm
Hysterical. But true nonetheless.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
first post is correct | 28-Jun-2012 4:54 pm
The first post at 12:27 am is correct. If half of the firm partnership is non-equity then the real "profit per partner" is roughly half of their reported PEP - which is "profit per equity partner". One half of their reported profit per equity partner of £840,000 equals a profit per partner of £420,000. Firms use non-equity partners to hide the real profitability of the partnership as a whole.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Corporate sloth | 3-Jul-2012 0:16 am
For goodness sake you are all obsessed with profit and PEP levels. Are you capitalist robots? What happened to your real interests before you sacrificed them for the tedium of commercial law?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment