Harbottle & Lewis has been given the all clear by News International (NI) to talk to authorities about its remit in the 2007 investigation of phone hacking at News of the World (NoW).
The firm was instructed in 2007 to help investigate phone hacking at the tabloid after the paper’s former royal editor Clive Goodman was jailed along with private investigator Glenn Mulcaire for hacking royal aides’ phones. The firm was sent a dossier of emails to review in a bid to determine whether hacking went further than just one rogue reporter.
The firm has since come under attack from News International owner Rupert Murdoch and his son James for making a “major mistake” in finding no evidence that Goodman’s activities were known about or supported by other members of NoW (15 July 2011). Murdoch said the firm failed to report other wrongdoing at the paper that was allegedly shown by the emails.
The firm has claimed that until now it has been prevented from defending itself due to client confidentiality (20 July 2011). However, on Wednesday evening a statement issued by parent company News Corp’s newly installed management and standards committee released Harbottle from its obligations, allowing the firm to talk to police and parliament about the exact remit it was given by NI when it was instructed in 2007.
A source close to the matter described News Corp’s decision as “a step in the right decision”.
At the time of writing, Harbottle could be contacted for comment.
In a statement, News Corp said: “News Corporation’s management and standards committee [MSC] can confirm that News International has today authorised the law firm Harbottle & Lewis to answer questions from the Metropolitan Police Service and parliamentary select committees in respect of what they were asked to do.
“The MSC is authorised to co-operate fully with all relevant investigations and inquiries in the News of the World phone hacking case, police payments and all other related issues across News International, as well as conducting its own enquiries where appropriate.”
Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 21-Jul-2011 1:50 pm
News International have put the ball firmly into Harbottle's court. Any kind of rebuttal to press reporting has to acheive two things to draw a line - explain their brief and do so in a way that shows why the finger pointing is wrong and unfair in order to kill off further questions. And even if News International have waived confidentiality, Harbottle may still be free to assert that it is not in their client's interest to have their lawyers commenting however much it is in that law firm's interest to do so and choose to stay above it and ride it out. That is a big call to make.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Poof | 21-Jul-2011 5:14 pm
Well Rupert Murdcoh brought it on himself so even if it is not in the client's best interest to discuss. Harbottle should bat this away firmly.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sticky wicket | 22-Jul-2011 12:32 pm
Harbottle should bat this away firmly ....
If they can. A great defence is that 'we'd like to tell you all the truth and you'll all see how right we were but can't because of client confidentiality - so you'll just have to believe us'.
But News International have now asked them to put up or shut up. Not only do they have to bat this away firmly they have to put the ball out of the ground, over the pavilion and lost. Let's hear it guys.
Ask David Cameron how easy it is to make a News International issue 'go away'.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment