The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Harbottle & Lewis has been acting on behalf of the Royal Family over the publication of naked pictures of Prince Harry.
The firm was called in by the royals after photographs emerged of the prince inside a hotel room in Las Vegas. It is understood that the advice is being led by senior partner Gerrard Tyrrell, who heads the media and information, litigation and advertising department, advising high-profile clients on information protection, privacy and defamation.
Once Clarence House had confirmed the mobile phone pictures were legitimate, they were distributed across the internet.
Harbottle & Lewis then issued warning letters to the British press via the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) suggesting that publication of the photographs would be an invasion of Harry’s right to privacy under the PCC’s code of ethics.
The guidance suggested that the pictures did not pass the ‘public interest test’ and that as they were taken in a private hotel room, the prince had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The firm has previously acted for The Queen, Prince Charles and Kate Middleton when the Royal Family had concerns about paparazzi pictures and the use of unauthorised or intrusive photographs.
Tyrrell was also instructed to respond to a claim in the Evening Standard that the Duke of Edinburgh was suffering from cancer.
Today, The Sun has published the pictures of Prince Harry on its front page, calling its editorial decision a “test of the freedom of the press”.