Halliwells’ staff: where are they now?
26 July 2010 | By Luke McLeod-Roberts
Related Articles
BLG, Hill Dickinson, HBJ Gateley Wareing carve up the remains of Halliwells
21 July 2010
Former Halliwells partners to repay £20.4m Spinningfields windfall
17 June 2011
Halliwells: picking at the carcass
23 January 2012
BLG and HBJ create firewall for liabilities of Halliwells arrivals
26 July 2010
Hope for Halliwells as trio offer takeover deal
5 July 2010
When Halliwells filed notice of its intention to appoint an administrator at the end of last month (TheLawyer .com, 25 June), Mike Ward, senior partner at HBJ Gateley Wareing, got straight on the phone to Shay Bannon and Dermot Power at BDO.

HBJ had been looking to plug a gap in the North West for some time and Ward figured that he should register his interest with the joint administrators immediately.
What Ward did not know at the time was that Hill Dickinson had already been in discussions with Halliwells’ senior management for several weeks to take over the entirety of the financially troubled firm.
It was thought that Hill Dickinson’s primary interest was in acquiring the Manchester office, which would have given it a much- needed boost in that city, where the Liverpool firm’s appointment of former DLA Piper joint private equity head Darryl Cooke to runthe office had not delivered anticipated growth levels.
To complicate matters further for HBJ, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert (BLG) was already in the frame to acquire Halliwells’ defendant insurance business.
“We were invited to a meeting in mid-June, in which it was made pretty clear that Halliwells was in serious financial difficulty,” BLG chief executive David Jabbari tells The Lawyer. “The bank wasn’t likely to renew Halliwells’ overdraft facility and it was very likely the firm would go into administration.”
Share and share alike
In the end the deal that was approved by the court saw Halliwells’ Manchester and London offices split mainly between BLG and HBJ (see table), while Hill Dickinson took Halliwells’ 91-strong Liverpool office and the remainder of its Sheffield office that had not already agreed to go to Kennedys.
A source close to Hill Dickinson says that, ultimately, “client demands and people looking to go elsewhere” meant Hill Dickinson had to downsize its ambitions.
Despite being a relative latecomer to the negotiations, Halliwells was not uncharted territory for HBJ. The two firms had, in fact, held a two-hour meeting in 2006 with a view to scoping terrain for a possible merger. They established that they had a lot in common, according to Ward, but the talks ultimately foundered because Halliwells’ end goal was to float, an objective HBJ did not share. But unfortunately that provided little traction when it came to recent events.

The notice of intention to appoint an administrator was filed on the same day as the quarterly rent bill was due, providing a temporary moratorium against the landlord and the bank coming in to seize assets.
But all parties were cognisant that failure to do a deal could see the clients and the work in progress walk out the door. A case in point was the fact that major banks kicked Halliwells off their panels when notice was filed. There was a risk that other clients might follow suit and the acquiring firms did not want to test their patience.
HBJ spent its time negotiating with BDO and with the elected representative of the Manchester commercial practice, Rod Waldie. In the space of three weeks heads of the firm’s business units travelled up to Manchester to meet with their counterparts. Apart from engaging Clearwater Corporate Finance to run some cashflow models, because of concerns about working capitalrequirements for the partners it wanted to hire, HBJ did not engage any external advisers. It has ended up with around 200 people, including 43 partners split across corporate, property, employment, IP, pensions and family. “What we’ve got is a complete mirror image of what we’ve got elsewhere,” explains Ward.
But considering that most interest was elicited by the insurance business (BLG, Hill Dickinson, Kennedys, Keoghs and Weightmans all reportedly considered taking a look), did HBJ draw the short straw?
“We’ve never been interested in a volume business,” counters Ward. “I’ve never liked that because I tend to feel those organisations [the insurers] try to run your business for you. If we’d had to take the whole lot we’d have said no.”
Crown jewels
BLG’s Jabbari is content with his lot. “I believe that the insurance practice was the jewel in the crown of Halliwells. At its core was the former James Chapman practice, and these partners were trying to do the kind of deal they should have done four years ago instead of merging with Halliwells.
“We see this as a business that can be immediately profitable, a strong business with recurrent income and limited costs of funding.”
No management structure has been established for the team joining BLG, around seven of whom will join as fixed-share partners.
The Hill Dickinson partners, including Halliwells managing partner Jonathan Brown, will also be absorbed into the new business, albeit with no direct management responsibilities. In Liverpool they will move into existing Hill Dickinson offices, while Hill Dickinson will acquire Halliwells’ Sheffield space at City Plaza. HBJ, in contrast, has decided to appoint Waldie to run the Manchester operation.
BLG and HBJ are currently sharing dozens of support staff, paid by BDO under a transitional services agreement, as well as space in the former Halliwells’ headquarters at Spinningfields, paying above market rent until 28 September, by which point they would be expected to renegotiate terms or move out.
“There’s no doubt that the current rent is higher than the market rate by a considerable margin,” confirms Ward. “We’re client-focused and the overheads are higher than the clients would like.”
Ward points to similarities between the legacy Halliwells client base and HBJ’s in terms of small- to medium-sized enterprises, but is excited about gaining more capital markets work through the Halliwells contacts once the market heats up.
The similarities do not end there. When HBJ took possession of new offices in Birmingham in 2003, it received an upfront financial incentive that it shared between its equity partners. But unlike Halliwells, it took the more prudent move of locking in recipients for a period of three years.
In contrast, when Halliwells filed notice only 15 of the original 40 recipients remained at the firm. Two of those 15 were executive chairman Ian Austin, who has since left for Heatons, and senior partner Alec Craig, whose whereabouts was unknown as this article went to press (one lawyer involved in the negotiations asked, “Who’s Alec Craig?”). The other 13 recipients have all joined HBJ (see Premium Partners box).
So should alarm bells be ringing for Ward that he is taking on not only Halliwells’ ill-fated property arrangements, but also that his firm took just three weeks to hire 200 people, some of whom he has yet to vet extensively?
“I do ask myself that question every five minutes,” he admits candidly. “It’s not something we’re taking lightly. This is the biggest financial transaction we’ve done in the history of the practice.”
He takes comfort from the fact that he has the backing of his partnership.
“We voted unanimously to do this,” he emphasises. “We’re all in it together and we don’t have any dissenting voices.”
The deal-doers
For Halliwells: Rita Lowe, CMS Cameron McKenna
For RBS and Lombard: Chris Howard and Andy Hart, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
For Hill Dickinson: Steven Cottee, LG
For HBJ Gateley Wareing and BLG: In-house advice
The partners who received the Spinningfields premium
Ian Austin
Mike Ball
Andrew Buchanan
Alec Craig
Charles Glaskie
Rebecca Grisewood
Mark Halliwell
Stephen Hills
Jonathan Moakes
Susan Molloy
Andrew Platt
Paul Rose
Karen Spencer
Paul Thomas
Rod Waldie


Readers' comments (15)
IHateBPP | 26-Jul-2010 12:05 pm
You missed out the whereabouts of the people shafted by the various firms, who now have the dole to look forward to.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jul-2010 1:51 pm
Where the people whose next destination is Jobcentre Plus?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jul-2010 2:21 pm
It is interesting that the vast majority of the 15 still there at the end were also there prior to the rapid expansion. This means that almost all of the new blood left the ship before it sank.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Salt | 26-Jul-2010 8:54 pm
Regarding the people whose next destination is Jobcentre Plus, over 30 were let go last week, and the 78 people who are in the 'Transistional Services Agreement staff' are due to be made redundant on 28 September. The glimmer of hope is that both main purchasing firms - BLG and Gateleys - are setting up new Manchester offices, so may have a set of jobs to offer (albeit on new employment contracts). Tough times for those let down by the list of people above.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26-Jul-2010 11:36 pm
Arthur Mckenna and Fred Royle , who basically ran James Chapman in the 50s 60s and 70s , would turn in their grave if they could see the shambles this ill timed ill fated merger has turned out to be
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 27-Jul-2010 5:43 am
Lets not forget that a lot of that new blood also happily pocketed their share of the premium, thereby enjoying the fruits of such rapid expanison, and only then left the ship before it sank. They were just as greedy as those who stayed!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
FB | 27-Jul-2010 9:01 am
"Halliwells' end goal was to float"
LMAOROFL (feel free to google that if you haven't seen it before)
Oh, that's cheered up my morning. Hilarious!
Hard to believe the architects of this catastrophe have gone on to profitable jobs elsewhere.
Meanwhile, nobody has talked about the recruiters, who were still recommending Halliwells to people right up to the collapse in full knowledge that the ship was about to capsize...
Ethics, anyone? Or is that just a county east of London?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Floater | 27-Jul-2010 8:59 pm
down the toilet it goes
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ashley Balls | 27-Jul-2010 10:17 pm
It is good to read teh popular support for those who did not make it to a lifeboat BUT where is the commentary on the skill(?) of the management that caused the disaster in the first place. Taking a multi million Pound T/O business with profit margins of 30%+ and running it aground in less than 2 years is pretty spectacular and worthy of some further investigation. Just who were the clowns who achieved this mess?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 27-Jul-2010 11:43 pm
FB - VERY DROLL . I LOVED HE ETHICS NOTE
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 28-Jul-2010 7:51 am
There are some industrial strength egos involved in this. It will be interesting to see how they react to being demoted to salaried/fixed-share partners in a sub-LLP of a firm from Birmingham they will have looked down at.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
sebastiannook | 28-Jul-2010 8:04 am
FB , LOVED THE ETHICS/ESSEX LINE - BRILLIANT - GET OUT OF THE LAW AND ONTO THE STAGE - MUCH MORE FUN TOO
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
anonymous | 28-Jul-2010 11:01 am
Re- the "the whereabouts of the people shafted by the various firms", I think that is what is alluded to by the 118 difference between the total of people employed by Halliwells and the number taken largely by BLG, Hill Dix and Gateleys in the above table. Not all of these will be made redundant, Odd ones here and there will find new homes in the coming weeks (eg those going to Shoosmiths), but many will join the dole queue and as for the fate of the future trainees, see here http://www.thelawyer.com/halliwells-future-manchester-and-london-trainees-le
ft-jobless/1005107.article
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3-Aug-2010 4:00 pm
The "top dogs" at Halliwells have always been Ego maniacs and nothing less than absolute snobs.
Unfortunately it is the honest, hard working people at the other end of the ladder that once again have to bear the brunt of the geedy people. It is so wrong that these partners have landed on their feet. They moan about taking drops in their six figure salaries - aw what a shame. It would be justice if they at least lost their houses, cars, holiday homes etc and had to join the people they've shafted in the dole queue!!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 23-Mar-2013 8:24 pm
I worked for HL over twenty years ago as an office junior. Got to say a lot of the big bosses looked right down their noses at you big time. Sbobbery just Its the front line staff i feel for.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment