The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Phone hacking of Bulger killer raises further questions about the police and the News of the World
On Sunday 28 August 2011 TheSunday Timesreported that Operation Weeting police officers have warned Robert Thompson, one of the killers of James Bulger, that his telephone may have been hacked by the News of the World (NoW). It is reported that details relating to him and others close to him appear in the papers being examined by the investigation. The story is by David James Smith, author of a book about the Bulger case - The Sleep of Reason - and was, surprisingly, not front page news. It was picked up in the Metro but has received very little media attention.
Smith draws attention to a series of ’exclusive’ stories about Thompson published in the NoW. In June 2002 the tabloid claimed Thompson had been “rushed to hospital” after taking an overdose; in January 2003 the newspaper reported that he was starting a course at art college; in April 2004 he was said to have a job and was “living in the lap of luxury in a trendy apartment block on Merseyside”; in November 2004 the tabloid’s exclusive was that Bulger’s mother Denise Fergus had come face-to-face with her son’s killer.
But the important aspect of the story is not that another person’s phone was hacked, but that the NoW was able to obtain the mobile telephone number of an individual who had been given a secret identity – known only to a very small number of people – to protect him.
In 2001 the High Court had granted a wide ranging injunction to prevent the identification of the two individuals who had been convicted of the murder of James Bulger. This was granted because of the ’clear and credible’ risk to their lives from mob vengeance or revenge attacks. It was accepted that if Thompson’s identity had become public knowledge, the exposure could potentially have put his life at risk. It appears that anyone seeking to obtain Thompson’s mobile number would have been in breach of it.
The question is: how did the NoW obtain the mobile telephone number of an individual who had been given a secret identity? One obvious possible source is the police. Serious questions have already been raised about the leaking of information by corrupt police officers to the NoW. Scotland Yard’s Operation Elveden is now investigating allegations of corrupt payments to police officers. It seems likely that this investigation will now be considering how the NoW was able to find Thompson’s number and then hack his telephone in order to run stories that potentially put him in danger.