The Lawyer Africa Elite 2014 features an in-depth look at 46 leading independent firms’ strategies in 15 key sub-Saharan jurisdictions, as well as the views of in-house counsel from some of Africa’s largest companies... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LAWYERS are working on a model contract which could form the basis of a sports arbitration service for sponsorship disputes.
The Institute of Sports Sponsorship (ISS) is putting together a framework for an arbitration system to cut down on the cost of contractual disputes.
The idea is to build up an effective system of case law on which to judge future conflicts.
ISS legal sub-committee member Richard Glynn, of City firm Nicholson Graham & Jones, says: "An essential first step in the process is the creation of an agreed 'model' contract which all parties find an acceptable base for sponsorship agreements.
"The essential contractual relationship must offer fair financial reward to sport and a reasonable return in exposure and goodwill for the sponsor and apply at all levels of sponsorship."
The ISS has also been in discussion with sister organisation the Central Council for Physical Recreation, which has been in favour of arbitration for some time.
The institute's proposals are aimed solely at commercial disputes and would not cover disciplinary matters or constitutional matters.