The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The government is reviewing how the court system deals with competition issues, but is unlikely to go for a dedicated competition court - the solution favoured by some members of the judiciary
The review comes as the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the Lord Chancellor's Department (LCD) struggle to implement two major pieces of competition law legislation: the Enterprise Act and the European Commission's (EC) modernisation proposals.
A senior High Court judge told The Lawyer: "This is a highly sophisticated area of the law. Litigants are entitled to have their cases heard by specialists." Some lawyers agree - Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partner Jon Lawrence, for example, said a competition division of the High Court would make "good commercial and practical sense".
Adam Brown, in charge of the implementation at the DTI, said: "The view, particularly from the LCD, is that the world is full of new areas of the law, and if we created new courts all the time it would fall apart." The LCD recently shelved expensive plans for a new commercial court.
The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) is hoping to attract High Court judges when it advertises for new panel members this spring, and has a much-expanded remit to consider civil cases under the Enterprise Act.
However, the CAT is a part-time, quasi-judicial body and for civil cases lacks both the power and the profile of the High Court.