Going global in Germany
25 October 1999
Related Articles
TOP INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRMS - GERMANY
27 September 1994
The year dot
18 December 2000
Reaching the top of the German markets
25 October 1999
20 YEARS OF THE LAWYER: 2000
5 December 2007
Around the world in 365 days
20 December 1999
Most players in the German legal market have known that internationalisation has been on its way for two or three years. It has simply been a question of when it would arrive. Last year, most leading practices were being wooed by just about every major UK firm, and 1999 was decision time.
In a couple of years, there will be hardly a firm in the top 25 national ranking (see table, page 29) which is not part of an international firm or exclusive alliance.
There is one exception - the M&A and finance powerhouse Hengeler Mueller Weitzel. But in truth, the fierce independence of the firm is borne of a secure working relationship with Slaughter and May and Davis Polk & Wardwell, an arrangement which many see as better integrated than some of the merged firms.
It is now rare to hear that it is better for firms to stay independent than lose the referral work from London, New York or Paris. However, it is likely that this argument was always only an excuse put about by senior lawyers in order to avoid restructuring their practices.
Most international mergers (Punder Volhard Weber & Axster with Clifford Chance and Boesebeck Droste with Lovell White Durrant are good examples) take place because German firms have realised that they need to be able to offer a one-stop shop for industry, whose export growth has noticeably picked up. In other words, an international merger secures a domestic client base for German firms. And international firms want a foothold in the huge German market, not just because so many companies are expanding and acquiring abroad, but also because the domestic market itself dwarfs anything else in Europe.
This process is taken for granted so much that the domestic mergers in the last two years - such as Hasche Eschenlohr with Sigle Loose, Gaedertz with Schon Nolte or Wessing with a number of smaller firms - were made with an eye on the international market. Indeed, most German law firms have expanded in order to be able to specialise. For the first time they are being managed along practice or industry-based lines, which allows them to be far more easily integrated into international structures.
So which firms are left? Of the 25 leading firms in the JuVe national ranking, three are international (Clifford Chance, Doser Amereller Noack/Baker & McKenzie, and Shearman & Sterling); nine are part of international firms or exclusive groups; and two (Hengeler Mueller and Norr Stiefenhofer & Lutz) have close relationships with UK firms.
Of the others, Beiten Burkhardt Mittl & Wegener is a founder member of alliance BBLP, while Wessing & Berenberg-Gossler works with Benelux and French firms. Both have hinted that a link-up with a UK firm is inevitable, but some of their lawyers see this as a medium-term, rather than an immediate, option.
Of the rest, one is a dyed-in-the-wool multidisciplinary partnership (Haarmann Hemmelrath & Partner) and three are seen as mid-size corporate firms, even if they do show excellence in other areas (Schilling Zutt & Anschutz, Pollathe & Partner, Haver & MailAnder).
Which leaves four: Bruckhaus Westrick Heller Lober, Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch RechtsanwAlte, Feddersen Laule and Gaedertz are considered highly attractive partners by UK firms, albeit for different reasons. Both Gaedertz and Feddersen have risen in prominence in the last two years and have not been short of offers from both law firms and accountants.
But the stars are Bruckhaus and Gleiss. Unconvinced by Clifford Chance, Bruckhaus insists that it is concentrating on extending its already outstanding domestic market position. Younger lawyers at the firm, many of whom have spent time in the US, say there is no need to rush, but peer wistfully across the Atlantic.
After its letdown with Stibbe Simont, according to some Gleiss is ready to try again. But one Stuttgart partner says that rumours of it entering a "best friends" relationship with Travers Smith Braithwaite are "absolute rubbish".
National ranking in Germany 199
Bruckhaus Westrick Heller Lober
Hengeler Mueller Weitzel Wirtz
Deringer Tessin Herrmann & Sedemund
Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch & Partner
Oppenhoff & RAdler Linklaters & Alliance
Punder Volhard Weber & Axster
Boesebeck Droste
Doser Amereller Noack/Baker & McKenzie
Feddersen Laule Ewerwahn Scherzberg Nor, Stiefenhofer & Lutz
BBLP Beiten Burkhardt Mittl & Wegener
Clifford Chance
CMS Hasche Sigle Eschenlohr Peltzer
Gaedertz RechtsanwAlte
Haarmann Hemmelrath & Partner
Heuking Kuhn Loer Heussen Wojtek
Schilling Zutt & Anschutz
Shearman & Sterling
Wessing & Berenberg-Gossler
Haver & MailAnder
Menold Herrlinger
Pollath & Partner
Schurmann & Partner
Graf von Westphalen Fritze & Modest
There is one bastion of German law which some UK lawyers thought could never be breached. Transaction skills and client service could never reach international standards unless German firms were more flexible in the drafting of contracts. It was fashionable to complain about the encroachment of Anglo-Saxon law into Germany. But a vital change is the leading firms' acceptance that the appearance of contracts spelling out every warranty is not due to the power of London firms or Anglo-Saxon investment banks. German firms realise that Anglo-Saxon contracts are becoming the international standard because they are exhaustive, not because they are Anglo-Saxon. Their emergence in Germany heralds the arrival of punctuated, transaction-based legal advice. German lawyers are no longer able to insist that the statute referred to in the contract covers any potential problem. International clients have wanted more for some time, and German firms are now discovering the advantages. When things move in Germany, they move fast. It it is not only big City firms which should cement German ties. Medium-size and regional firms should make the call - if they don't get called first, that is.
National Ranking 1999 Germany
first tier
Bruckhaus Westrick Heller Lober
Hengeler Mueller Weitzel Wirtz
second tier
Deringer Tessin Herrmann & Sedemund
Gleiss Lutz Hootz Hirsch
Oppenhoff & Radler Linklaters & Alliance
Punder, Volhard, Weber & Axster
third tier
Boesebeck Droste
Doser Amereller Noack/Baker & McKenzie
Feddersen Laule Ewerwahn Scherzberg Finkelnburg Clemm
Norr, Stiefenhofer & Lutz
fourth tier
BBLP Beiten Burkhardt Mittl & Wegener
Clifford Chance
CMS Hasche Sigle Eschenlohr Peltzer
Gaedertz
Haarmann, Hemmelrath & Partner
Heuking Kuhn Luer Heussen Wojtek
Schilling, Zutt & Anschutz
Shearman & Sterling
Wessing & Berenberg-Gossler
fifth tier
Haver & Mailander
Menold Herrlinger
Pollath + Partner
Schurmann & Partner
Graf von Westphalen, Fritze & Modest

