The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A lawsuit filed against the former general counsel and an in-house lawyer at Global Crossing has been allowed to proceed, despite a US federal judge voicing doubts over the strength and practicality of the case against them.
In August, Judge Gerard Lynch of the Southern District of New York denied a motion put forward by James Gorton, the former general counsel of the bankrupt international voice and data carrier, and in-house lawyer Jackie Armstrong, to dismiss them from the $1.7bn (£950m) lawsuit.
The two in-house counsel were among 23 former executives of Global Crossing who were named in the lawsuit JPMorgan Chase v Winnick, which was filed by JPMorgan Chase and a syndicate of major banks following Global Crossing's bankruptcy in 2002.
The banks, which had loaned Global Crossing more than $2bn (£1.12bn), claim that the executives initiated fraudulent transactions prior to the company entering bankruptcy to inflate revenue and disguise the company's financial position.
Gorton and Armstrong had sought to have themselves dismissed from the matter on the basis that they did not know, or did not assist in, the alleged fraudulent 'swap' transactions.
Gorton also claimed that he had opposed one swap transaction and initiated an investigation, undertaken by his former firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, after a whistleblower had brought the scheme to light.
Judge Lynch said the banks had made a sufficient case that a fact-finder could infer that the two in-house counsel were aware and involved in the alleged scam.
However, he also expressed reservations over the strength of the banks' claims against the lawyers, stating that many facts were subject to "conflicting interpretations" and that they did not appear "particularly potent".
The case follows the payment of $325m (£181.3m) by Global Crossing executives last year to settle employee and shareholder litigation. Simpson Thacher also paid $19.5m (£10.9m) at the time to avoid any potential claims regarding its investigation into the whistleblower's claims.
JPMorgan Chase was represented by Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy.
Gorton, now a partner at Latham & Watkins, was represented by Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Silberberg, while Armstrong turned to LeBoeuf Lamb Green & MacRae.