Frontrunners emerge for Clyde & Co senior partner role

  • Print
  • Comments (53)

Readers' comments (53)

  • The comparisons between firms and former empires is too attractive to ignore. What contributed to the fall of the Mongol Empire?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Throughout history, all civilizations rise and fall and the decline is always prefaced by decadence. Where is any law firm on that curve? Any prospective senior partner, or merger partner, would do well to think that through very carefully. For the uninitiated, cultural decay, structural weakness and reliance on finance are the usual warning signs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clydes desperately needs to be be swallowed up by a much bigger international firm and lop off the low value/UK regional stuff. It was pursuing a highly successful international strategy. This would put it back on track to restore the ground lost by this ill-conceived merger. Herbert Smith is the obvious candidate given the litigation base of both firms. Clydes also desperately need a credible management team. It's now painfully clear that Payton's strength concealed the weakness of all those around him.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why is no one talking about David Bennett as SP? He is highly respected, and more to the point he is both trusted and liked by partners and associates!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clydes needs to merge, to sort out its idiosyncratic business lines and petty empires and its tolerance of behaviours which are frankly archaic and reminders of a world without securities legislation, accountability to clients or adherence to even the most basic compliance procedures. So much will happen once Payton departs, "Clydes Chambers" ends and Hasson becomes more directly accountable to the partners as a whole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In response to Borat, the end of most empires comes about through disunity. So having a clear and common purpose, with teamwork, strong leadership, and the right level of resources will be critical after Michael steps aside.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 10.52 - the last thing Clydes needs to do is merge again. On the Insurance side alone the firm looks like a total joke - some clients who use the Northern office must have had 5 Notices of Change in as many years. What they need is stability and to stay out of the legal press for a reasonable period of time. If you look at the main players CC, DLA, A&O, Slaughters - you either don't hear very much at all or only good news - not chaotic claptrap/arms flailing in the air all year long. They are going to implode and destroy themselves the way they are going about it - chill in 2013! Hands off the blogs … keep calm and carry on …

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Could be there won't be much choice in the matter come 2014/15 when the economy swings out of favour for Clydes and the post merger exits begin.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fair play to you for speaking out for the clients. So what exactly is in all of this merger fever for us? Not very much at all I'd say. Since when has 'big' ever meant 'quality' or 'service' for clients?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • According to published numbers, between 2009 and 2012 Clydes grew turnover by 50% whilst PEP declined by 7%. By any standards, that's some growth story! What's the point?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (53)