The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
There is yet more activity in the world of… er… complaining about lawyers. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which until this month was known as the Law Society Regulation Authority, is consulting the profession on whether to make its reprimands public.
The SRA looks after education and training, indemnity insurance and ethics, and crucially is the body to which the Legal Complaints Service refers complaints if discipline needs to be enforced.
The SRA has responsibility for prosecuting lawyers at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. It also has discretion to punish with merely a 'reprimand' or 'serious reprimand' - the profession's equivalent of a stern word from teacher - certainly not a serious discouragement for cynical school rebels.
But under the new proposals reprimanded firms could be publicly branded as such. Rather than relying on mere conscience alone, the damage to reputations would force solicitors to behave by hitting them where it hurts - in their pockets.