Should you pay your workers for sleeping on the job?
By Karen Harvie
Two recent cases have rekindled the debate about when time spent at work but sleeping counts as working time for the purposes of the rules on National Minimum Wage. Below, we review these decisions and what they mean for employers.
In Esparon v Slavikovska a care worker successfully claimed that each hour of a sleep-in shift counted towards the time for which she should receive the minimum wage. A key factor that influenced the outcome was that her employers were required to have a suitable person on the premises, to comply with care home regulations.
In Whittlestone v BJP Home Support Ltd, a care worker successfully argued she had been underpaid in respect of sleep-overs. Key factors were that she was required by her contract to sleep-over, an express term of her contract stated that failure to do so would result in disciplinary action and there was evidence that she could not, as the judge put it, ‘slip out for a late-night movie or for fish and chips’. A further feature of the Whittlestone case is the finding that time spent travelling between assignments (Mrs Whittlestone had a number of service users to visit during a day) also counted as working time for minimum wage purposes…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Two recent cases illustrate the importance of employers making reasonable adjustments for disabled employees placed at risk of redundancy.
The FAPL has issued a warning to people posting unofficial videos of goals online, stating that these videos are in ‘breach of copyright’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…