No5’s Khalique represents party who lacked capacity to make decision about amputation
No5 Chambers’ Nageena Khalique has appeared in the Court of Appeal before Laws LJ, Richards LJ and Gloster LJ, instructed by the official solicitor as litigation in friend to represent a protected party who lacked the capacity to make a decision about amputation.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
TUPE applies where a client decides to engage a new service provider instead of an existing one, but what if the client instructs the existing service provider to remove an employee from the contract before the TUPE transfer takes place?
If local veto rights apply to wind farms what next – prisons, fracking, gypsy sites?