No5 successful in decision that saw secretary of state dismiss appeal for wind farm
This was a recovered decision by the secretary of state. Two local planning authorities resisted the appeal in light of the fact that the proposed development straddled the boundaries of each. Jack Smyth of No5 Chambers represented South Holland District. It advanced a narrow case based upon a single reason for refusal on the ground that the wind turbines were located so close to a dwelling (the Birches) that it would cause an oppressive and overwhelming impact on the residents’ amenity.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
A company can suffer a detriment under the Equality Act and so bring a claim for direct discrimination. Yet a company is impersonal, so how can that be?
Judge not convinced that the fact the Claimant was required to be on the premises meant sleeping was working.