Helen Mulholland practises in clinical negligence and personal injury. She has developed a specialist clinical negligence practice and undertakes high-value and complex clinical negligence litigation.
Mulholland is ranked in Chambers UK for clinical negligence work (Band 2). She is an excellent strategist and uses her considerable analytical skills to the tactical advantage of her clients.
Mulholland frequently represents at inquests and is familiar with, and adept at handling, the coronial process. She is proficient in dealing with cases involving children and protected parties and accepts instructions in Article 2-compliant inquests.
As a personal injury practitioner, Mulholland has extensive experience of conducting complex personal injury litigation in her own right. She has also acted as junior on a number of cases involving catastrophic injury or complex matters of law.
She undertakes a wide variety of personal injury work including road traffic litigation, public and employers’ liability and clinical negligence and has extensive experience of motorcycle accidents and their resultant injuries.
Mulholland specialises in cases involving brain injury, chronic pain and cases of multiple serious injury. She acts for both claimants and defendants and accepts instructions from publicly funded clients and under conditional fee agreements.
She has excellent presentation skills and regularly provides training to solicitors. She is currently presenting a course on litigation arising from a delay in diagnosis of cancer for MBL seminars. Mulholland is an excellent courtroom performer.
Click here to find out more about Helen Mulholland.
This material was sourced from the Kings Chambers website.
News from Kings Chambers
Briefings from Kings Chambers
Ben Williams, a barrister at Kings Chambers, considers how companies can control the misuse of group email systems.
Tina Ranales-Cotos, a barrister at Kings Chambers, discusses whether e-cigarettes can be banned in the office.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The effects of recent changes to civil litigation are only just beginning to be felt, but barristers in the regions have several reasons to be cheerful