Kings Chambers’ Carter appears for George Haigh and Co in village green case
Martin Carter of Kings Chambers has appeared for the intervener in Adamson v Paddico Ltd and others.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in the case and a second appeal that dealt with the same point.
The court had to decide what was the relevance of a period of delay between the erroneous registration of land as a village green and the making of an application for rectification of the register by the removal of the wrong entry, pursuant to section 14 of the Commons Registration Act 1965, by the removal of the wrong entry.
The court has held that in the ordinary course of events delay will not of itself be fatal to an application to rectify the register and that courts should consider whether there is evidence to show that anybody has truly been prejudiced by the delay.
Carter appeared for the intervener in the case, George Haigh and Co, and argued in support of the appellant’s contention that the Court of Appeal had gone wrong in principle when it allowed Mr Adamson’s appeal.
The appellant’s and intervener’s arguments held sway and the Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision.
News from Kings Chambers
Briefings from Kings Chambers
In the months since the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Cheshire West, the courts have continued to put into effect Lady Hale’s ‘acid test’.
In Thompson v Renwick Group plc, Mr Thompson was exposed to asbestos while working for his employer, a transport haulage company, during the mid-1970s.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The effects of recent changes to civil litigation are only just beginning to be felt, but barristers in the regions have several reasons to be cheerful