It is important to consider ADR in real-estate litigation, says Eversheds
William Densham, partner and real-estate litigation expert at Eversheds, has commented on the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in the case of PGF II SA v OMFS, which confirmed that a party’s failure to respond to an offer of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is unreasonable conduct that will allow the court to deviate from the usual cost consequences of a Part 36 offer.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Eversheds’ retail finance briefing is designed to keep you up to date with the latest legal, regulatory and industry developments affecting the retail finance industry.
Welcome additional form of protection for financial institutions and their employees.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all