Insurance disputes over the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire
In an article published in the scholarly journal Western Legal History, Robert James, co-leader of Pillsbury’s energy team, shakes up accepted wisdom and puts to the torch a few cherished myths about the aftermath of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire. His research into fire insurance coverage disputes after the disaster sheds new light on how residents coped with massive damage.
James, a California native born close to the San Andreas Fault, has long had an interest in the San Francisco catastrophe. In one book after another, he kept encountering the narrative that the press, politicians and public put so much pressure on insurers that they eventually caved. One history claimed that ‘a number of disputed cases went to court, and in every case the insurer lost’. Once James began to dig around in reported cases from the era, he could tell things were not so simple.
His article, ‘Six Bits or Bust: Insurance Litigation over the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire’, puts into context the good-guys/bad-guys narrative handed down over the years. While there were underwriters that chose to pay all policyholders in full ‘irrespective of the terms of their policies’, as Cuthbert Heath of Lloyd’s decreed, there were also European insurers who became infamous for offering 75 per cent or ‘six-bit’ compromises or denying coverage…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Aurora Energy decision deems discharges prohibited, leaves open question of permit shield applicability
On 3 September 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Alaska Community Action on Toxics v Aurora Energy Services LLC.
Scaling back considerably from the October 2012 term, the US Supreme Court issued only a few rulings affecting environmental law during the October 2013 term.