Eversheds represents AB SEB Trygg Liv in Swedish Supreme Court dispute
Hans Forssell and Göran Johansson from Eversheds Stockholm represented claimants AB SEB Trygg Liv in a dispute in the Swedish Supreme Court against defendants Skadeförsäkring AB and Länsförsäkringar Sak.
In the dispute, SEB Trygg Liv claimed compensation from the defendants under mandatory liability insurances of an insurance broker written by them.
The issue at stake in the Supreme Court was whether the broker owes a duty to observe ‘good insurance broker practice’ not only in its relation to the insurer’s customer (as argued by the defendants) but also in its relation to the insurer (as argued by SEB Trygg Liv).
The lower courts had ruled in favour of the defendants. The Supreme Court, however, held that the broker has to observe good insurance broker practice also related to the insurer.
The claim itself will now be decided in the court of first instance based on the decision of the Supreme Court.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The notion of ‘gross negligence’ is an important matter for customers and institutions alike and has been reviewed by the High Court and Supreme Court in deciding a recent case.
This report includes an analysis of the results of Eversheds survey on the Employment Tribunal process, which is based on 180 responses.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The Mid Staffordshire Inquiry’s call for a duty of candour will have far-reaching effects on the NHS and clinical negligence - if it is ever implemented