‘Employers should expect changes’ regarding zero-hours contracts, says Eversheds
Simon Rice-Birchall, partner at Eversheds, has said that after discussion over the potential abuse of zero-hour contracts, employers should expect some change to come.
Birchall, who was commenting after the government published a consultation into the use, and potential abuse, of zero-hour contracts in the UK workplace, said that the major problem faced by the government is the absence of any legal definition of a zero-hour contract.
He said: ‘This matters because any attempt at regulating their use without a clear definition will inevitably be a blunt instrument and may have unintended and undesirable consequences, for example putting up barriers to other forms of flexible work. This is one reason why the government is signalling a cautious approach to avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater.’
Birchall continued: ‘However, with the political heat rising over the potential abuse of zero-hour contracts, employers should expect some change to come.’
He added that it seems likely that the government will seek to stop employers from unnecessarily banning zero-hour workers working for another employer — so-called ‘exclusivity’ clauses — and that, in practice, few employers demand such exclusivity and many will consider this a reasonable step in the circumstances.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The current EU market abuse regime is in line for an overhaul. It is anticipated that the implementation of the new proposals may not come into force until 2016.
The ‘unfair relationship’ concept in respect of credit agreements was introduced into the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on 6 April 2007.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe