Dentons’ Paris international arbitration team sets victorious precedent
The Paris international arbitration team, including partner Jean-Christophe Honlet and associate Annelise Lecompte, have set a victorious precedent for Dentons’ client Farmex Technologies in a dispute against the Republic of Armenia.
Farmex, at the time not represented by counsel, lost an international arbitration against the Republic of Armenia. It filed to annul the award before the Paris Court of Appeal, Paris being the place of arbitration.
Since a reform of 2011, applications for annulment of international arbitral awards in France no longer suspend enforcement of those awards. The law provides for an exception, however, ‘where enforcement could severely prejudice the rights of one of the parties’. In spite of several attempts by applicants, French courts had always refused to apply that exception so far, in keeping with the pro-enforcement stance of the 2011 reform.
The 3 April 2014 decision of the Paris Court of Appeal (CME) in Farmex v Armenia is the first time a French court has accepted applying that exception and accordingly stay the enforcement of an international arbitral award in France pending the decision on annulment. That decision also clarifies the extent to which a party can waive its right to apply for annulment of an international award in France, another novelty of the 2011 international arbitration reform in France. It is the first case on that question as well. In spite of some broad waiver language in the arbitration agreement, not expressly referencing the right to apply for annulment however, Dentons was able to persuade the court that no waiver of the right to file for annulment had taken place.
Farmex v Armenia has now established an important precedent on those two essential points for international arbitration practitioners in France.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
‘Inversion’ transactions are nothing new, and the current proceedings appear to be just another replay of earlier games of tag between the government and US multinationals.
In Devon Canada Corporation v The Queen, the issue is whether the taxpayer may deduct $20,884,041 paid to cancel issued stock options.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.