Court says permitted use restriction breaks competition law
By Sarah Livestro
In a judgment that is likely to attract considerable attention, the Central London County Court has ruled that a permitted use restriction in a lease is anti-competitive and unenforceable.
Until 2011, the UK Land Exclusion Order exempted ‘land agreements’ from the ban on anti-competitive agreements. This meant that ‘permitted use’ restrictions — which restrict a tenant’s ability to carry on certain activities from leased premises — did not breach the UK competition law rules. Although the order is no longer in force, the view of the UK competition authorities — as set out in official Office of Fair Trading guidance — has always been that permitted use restrictions are unlikely to restrict competition. As a result, both landlords and tenants could be fairly confident that this type of restriction would ordinarily be legal and enforceable…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The aim of the act is to stop people being deterred from participating in socially useful activities due to worries about liability (although one peer said its text ‘would barely muster a pass in GCSE legal studies’).
The unilateral actions of one landlord could spark a chain of events that determines the entire lease
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…