Court says permitted use restriction breaks competition law
By Sarah Livestro
In a judgment that is likely to attract considerable attention, the Central London County Court has ruled that a permitted use restriction in a lease is anti-competitive and unenforceable.
Until 2011, the UK Land Exclusion Order exempted ‘land agreements’ from the ban on anti-competitive agreements. This meant that ‘permitted use’ restrictions — which restrict a tenant’s ability to carry on certain activities from leased premises — did not breach the UK competition law rules. Although the order is no longer in force, the view of the UK competition authorities — as set out in official Office of Fair Trading guidance — has always been that permitted use restrictions are unlikely to restrict competition. As a result, both landlords and tenants could be fairly confident that this type of restriction would ordinarily be legal and enforceable…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Two recent cases illustrate the importance of employers making reasonable adjustments for disabled employees placed at risk of redundancy.
The FAPL has issued a warning to people posting unofficial videos of goals online, stating that these videos are in ‘breach of copyright’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…