James Boyd specialises in employment law and practises as a member of the employment team in Chambers.
Boyd undertakes work for both employers and employees. He tends to be instructed in multi-day tribunal claims at the ‘local’ Circuit centres (Manchester, Liverpool and Leeds), as far north as Edinburgh and Glasgow and south as far as Southampton and Truro. He has appeared on a number of occasions in the Fair Industrial Tribunal in Belfast for one particular client.
He was led in the Employment Appeal Tribunal in the case of Meter U v Hardy/Ackroyd — a landmark decision on what is meant by the term ‘workforce’ in Regulation 7 of TUPE.
Boyd was successful in the Court of Appeal as the Junior in the Fecitt matter — a case that revolved around the correct test of causation in whistleblowing cases and vicarious liability.
He recently appeared in the Court of Appeal to present an argument about the breadth of the ‘special circumstances’ doctrine (CF Capital v Willoughby).
He has recently represented numerous trusts in a variety of cases including contentious TUPE transfers, whistleblowing claims, race discrimination matters and internal disciplinary hearings.
Boyd successfully defended Manchester City Football Club in relation to a claim of maternity discrimination by an ex-employee.
Click here to find out more about James Boyd.
This material was sourced from the Kings Chambers website.
News from Kings Chambers
Briefings from Kings Chambers
In the months since the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Cheshire West, the courts have continued to put into effect Lady Hale’s ‘acid test’.
In Thompson v Renwick Group plc, Mr Thompson was exposed to asbestos while working for his employer, a transport haulage company, during the mid-1970s.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The effects of recent changes to civil litigation are only just beginning to be felt, but barristers in the regions have several reasons to be cheerful