Attempt to remove party from proceedings fails
This unusual application in Teva Pharma BV & Anor v Amgen Inc & Anor  EWHC 3711 (Pat) related to proceedings to revoke a European patent and a declaration that a supplementary protection certificate (SPC) based upon it (for lipegfilgrastim) would not be valid. The proceedings were issued against the company listed as proprietor on the patents register (D1), even though that company had assigned the patent (without the claimant knowing) to a related company (D2) a few weeks earlier. D1 and D2 subsequently applied for an order that D1 should cease to be a party to proceedings commenced by the claimant.
The claimant believed that D1 had damaging documents in its possession and that the motive for the assignment had been a tactical one to avoid D1 having to give disclosure. The court had to decide whether it was ‘desirable’ within the meaning of CPR 19.2(3) for D1 to cease to be a party…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
Insolvency proceedings were opened in respect of the assets of a German resident; the liquidator then sought to set aside a transaction that had been entered into with a resident of Switzerland.
As of 1 October 2012, transfers of majority shares in a private limited liability company in Slovakia have become more complicated.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town