The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
London firm Swepstone Walsh is to be sued in the High Court in a negligence action where it is alleged the firm was to blame for the failure of a #2.7m claim.
A writ has been issued against Swepstone Walsh by the Swiss company Orsank SA and Orsank's UK representative, Broderick Munro-Wilson - a friend of Prince Charles.
The writ, issued by Hamlin Slowe, accuses Swepstone Walsh of negligence and breach of contract.
It says that Orsank and Munro-Wilson instructed the firm to act for them when they sued a firm of chartered surveyors for negligence in respect of a property project. But the claim was ultimately struck out for lack of prosecution.
The writ blames this on Swepstone Walsh, claiming it failed to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in prosecuting, and failed to serve a statement of claim within court time limits. It also accuses the firm of failing to apply for a time extension the day before a hearing in which the surveyors, Spencer Associates, applied to have the negligence action against them struck out.
Orsank says in its claim that, as a result of the case against Spencer Associates being struck out, the company lost all prospect of recovering damages, which it says could have been in the region of #2,745,565. The writ also claims that Orsank paid Swepstone Walsh costs of #37,971.54.
Swepstone Walsh acted on behalf of Ian Botham in his 1997 action against Imran Khan. Botham was later sued by the firm over #100,000 in unpaid fees, but the claim was dropped.