The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Employers will have to take adequate risk assessments to ensure that they do not leave themselves open to personal injury claims if the planned firefighters strike goes ahead
In situations where someone is injured as a result of the firefighters strike, most claimants would attempt to bring a claim against their employers.
"An employer has a duty at all times to consider risk of employers and also those that are not an employer," said Anthony Cherry, a partner at Beachcroft Wansbroughs.
Employers must ensure they have carried out a risk assessment in light of the impending strike to ensure they have taken any reasonable steps necessary to prevent injury occurring on their premises.
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert partner John Goodman said: "If an employer takes a blasé, head-in-the-sand approach then it could lead to a claim."
However, bringing such a claim may not be easy. Pattinson & Brewer partner Frances McCarthy said: "It's a very tricky one to deal with in the abstract, as there are so many possible scenarios."
A claimant would have to prove that there were reasonable steps an employer could have taken that would have then prevented the injury from occurring.
One thing seems more certain - it is unlikely that the Fire Brigades Union would face any possible action from individuals or from businesses. Goodman said: "Broadly speaking, a claimant would have to prove that they [the emergency services] made the situation worse by a positive action." Failure to attend an emergency does not make the emergency services liable for any damage.