The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Field Fisher Waterhouse (FFW) is heading for a High Court showdown with a former client, which is understood to have disputed that it ever instructed the firm.
FFW has filed a claim against US-based mobile entertainment company Rok Entertainment in a bid to recover £73,000 plus interest in alleged unpaid fees.
The firm argued that it was instructed by Rok to advise on the acquisition of Inter Credit Group, an English company with Swedish subsidiaries, but the claim form details apparent confusion as to whether FFW was ever engaged or not.
The claim form states: “Although there was no formal engagement letter, both parties understood that they had entered into a contract for the provision of legal services, which was created verbally and through conduct.”
It is alleged that when FFW chased up unpaid invoices Rok variously denied that it had instructed the firm. It also stated that it did not dispute that work was done for the company, but rather disputed the level of cost involved.