Hogan Lovells FFW enforces 18-month notice as privacy chief quits for Hogan Lovells By Lucy Burton 10 October 2013 11:32 17 December 2015 14:30 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 10 October 2013 at 12:55 More evidence that this firm is on the slide. It is like the Mad Hatter’s Tea Party. All of the big hitters are rushing for the door taking their clients with them and a bunch of low level mediocre people with big promises but no following are replacing them. Anywhere else everyone would be getting seriously worried about their futures, but in this “wonderland” they merely send out ludicrous press releases congratulating themselves! Reply Link Tommy Riordan 10 October 2013 at 14:11 Counter-productive and badly done. 6 months notice or even a year would be sufficient to keep Mr Ustaran’s clients with the firm. 18 months is crazy Reply Link Realist 10 October 2013 at 14:26 FFW is heading in ever decreasing circles. My money is on implosion within 12-18 months. They won’t need anyone to turn out the lights as the electricity will have been cut off well before then. In years to come FFW will be a leading case study in how not to manage a law firm. The head hunters must be all over them, although before long there won’t be many decent pickings left. Ustaran is a major loss and FFW senior management (a real misnomer) is delusional and weak. Reply Link George Patterson 10 October 2013 at 14:41 I doubt that 18mths could be enforceable. Step up anyone who would ever work for a firm that tried to impose that. Bad move FFW. Reply Link Anonymous 10 October 2013 at 15:03 How very sad all round. Eduardo is a massive figure in this niche but growing area. The FFW Members Agreement has long been a fascination to most lawyers. Reply Link Anon 10 October 2013 at 16:41 Did Abell serve out 18 months before joining Bird & Bird then? Or is it the case that compared to Ustaran – an undoubted star – Abell had no substantive following? But what planet is FFW on? 18 months in this day and age! Reply Link Pablo 10 October 2013 at 18:22 Just imagine how damaging it could be to hold a senior equity partner to 18 months in the office. He’s hardly going to be straining every sinew and being positive about all aspects of the firm, is he? And how can this be ‘usual’? How often have senior equity partners abandoned FFW? Reply Link Anonymous 11 October 2013 at 09:17 “Oh yes, it’s all very amicable, he LIKES being chained to his desk for a year and a half after he has decided to leave the firm.” This sends a terrible message to the market about what it’s like to work for FFW. Totally counter-productive. Reply Link Cool Runnings 11 October 2013 at 16:33 Abell – letters with Herbert Smith header got him out early. That is what it takes. FFW – awful firm. Headhunters all over them are putting in loads of rubbish partners and taking out the good ones. Halliwells………………… Reply Link Becky 14 October 2013 at 11:03 And Abell got away with taking a team. Way to go. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.