Female partners defy glass ceiling in record numbers
8 September 2008
Related Articles
UK200 2011
12 October 2011
Top of the PEPs - PEP Table
20 July 2007
UK200 2011 Contents
The UK200 2011
Top of the PEPs - Revenue Table
20 July 2007
Rolling Rev Counter 2009
19 August 2009
Twenty per cent of partners in top 100 now female; smaller firms outstrip magic circle
More women are breaking into the top ranks of the UK’s leading law firms than ever before, research for The Lawyer UK 200 Annual Report reveals.
The findings are in contrast to a report from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which last week found that the number of women occupying senior positions in business had fallen.
There are still far fewer female lawyers than male, but ratios at UK firms are improving, with 19.6 per cent of partners in the top 100 firms now female. This is a slight increase on the previous two years, when the figure was around 19 per cent.
The total number of female equity partners has risen by nearly 4.5 per cent despite a fall in the overall number of equity partners in the top 100.
Nabarro managing partner Nicky Paradise (pictured), one of the few women to lead a top 100 firm, said: “As we all get better at flexible working arrangements and not expecting everybody to follow the same career path, the numbers will naturally improve.”
Pensions specialist Sacker & Partners scores highest on the equality scale, with women accounting for 47.8 per cent of the partnership. This compares with 5.9 per cent at the worst performer, Anglo-Scottish private equity boutique Dickson Minto.
Next from bottom is Scotland’s Burness, where women account for just 10 per cent of the partnership. Firm chairman Philip Rodney pointed out that four female partners had been added since the statistics were compiled, adding: “Undoubtedly this is something we have to take account of for the future. We’re moving in the right direction.”
Magic circle firms proved to be less inclusive than their smaller counterparts. Just over 14 per cent of partners in the top four are female, compared with more than 20 per cent in the rest of the top 100.
Trowers & Hamlins head of corporate Jennie Gubbins said she was not surprised by that fact, adding: “I go to lots of meetings at lots of firms and I’m completely inured to being the only woman in the room.”
The latest research provides a stark contrast with early surveys conducted by The Lawyer. In 1992, 9.6 per cent of partners in the UK’s 10 largest firms were women, but that figure has risen by over 50 per cent to 15.9 per cent this year.
| Firm | Female partners | Total partners | Percentage of female partners |
| Sacker & partners | 11 | 23 | 47.8 |
| Forsters | 13 | 29 | 44.8 |
| Pannone | 46 | 110 | 41.8 |
| Berrymans | 42 | 117 | 35.9 |
| Russell Cooke | 14 | 41 | 34.1 |
| Beachcroft | 42 | 133 | 31.6 |
| Shoosmiths | 32 | 104 | 30.8 |
| Irwin Mitchell | 31 | 101 | 30.7 |
| Maclay Murray & Spens | 22 | 72 | 30.6 |
| Weightmans | 30 | 99 | 30.3 |
| DMH Stallard | 15 | 50 | 30.0 |
| Lewis Silkin | 13 | 44 | 29.5 |
| Bevan Brittan | 18 | 62 | 29.0 |
| Thomas Eggar | 19 | 66 | 28.8 |
| Manches | 16 | 56 | 28.6 |
| Fladgate Fielder | 11 | 39 | 28.2 |
| Withers | 30 | 108 | 27.8 |
| Charles Russell | 25 | 90 | 27.8 |
| DWF | 32 | 118 | 27.1 |
| Morgan Cole | 13 | 50 | 26.0 |
| Shepherd & Wed | 18 | 70 | 25.7 |
| Russell Jones & Walker | 11 | 43 | 25.6 |
| Penningtons | 13 | 51 | 25.5 |
| Browne Jacobson | 16 | 63 | 25.4 |
| Reynolds Porter | 16 | 63 | 25.4 |
| Kennedys | 24 | 95 | 25.3 |
| Wedlake Bell | 10 | 40 | 25.0 |
| Geldards | 12 | 49 | 24.5 |
| Halliwells | 37 | 154 | 24.0 |
| Mischon De Reya | 13 | 55 | 23.6 |
| Dundas & Wilson | 19 | 82 | 23.2 |
| Hugh James | 11 | 48 | 22.9 |
| Blake Lapthorn | 26 | 114 | 22.8 |
| Nabarro | 28 | 123 | 22.8 |
| Trowers & Hamlins | 24 | 106 | 22.6 |
| DWS | 40 | 177 | 22.6 |
| Farrer & Co | 14 | 62 | 22.6 |
| Pinsent Masons | 60 | 266 | 22.6 |
| Howard Kennedy | 15 | 67 | 22.4 |
| Eversheds | 77 | 344 | 22.4 |
| Clarke Willmott | 19 | 85 | 22.4 |
| Bird & Bird | 34 | 157 | 21.7 |
| Thring Townsend | 12 | 56 | 21.4 |
| Olswang | 19 | 89 | 21.3 |
| Hill Dickinson | 33 | 155 | 21.3 |
| Watson Burton | 8 | 38 | 21.1 |
| Bond Pearce | 14 | 67 | 20.9 |
| Martineau | 10 | 48 | 20.8 |
| Ashfords | 12 | 58 | 20.7 |
| Ward Hadaway | 11 | 54 | 20.4 |
| HBJ | 17 | 84 | 20.2 |
| BLP | 35 | 175 | 20.0 |
| McGrigors | 15 | 77 | 19.5 |
| Freeth Cartwright | 13 | 67 | 19.4 |
| Cobbetts | 18 | 93 | 19.4 |
| Addleshaw | 34 | 177 | 19.2 |
| Salans | 33 | 174 | 19.0 |
| Slaughters | 25 | 132 | 18.9 |
| LG | 16 | 86 | 18.6 |
| SJ Berwin | 31 | 167 | 18.6 |
| Lovells | 62 | 341 | 18.2 |
| Finers Stephens Innocent | 6 | 33 | 18.2 |
| Hammonds | 33 | 182 | 18.1 |
| CMS | 24 | 133 | 18.0 |
| Norton Rose | 44 | 246 | 17.9 |
| Walker Morris | 9 | 51 | 17.6 |
| Anderson Strathern | 8 | 46 | 17.4 |
| Brodies | 9 | 52 | 17.3 |
| Mills & Reeve | 14 | 82 | 17.1 |
| Wragge & Co | 19 | 113 | 16.8 |
| Macfarlanes | 12 | 72 | 16.7 |
| TLT | 12 | 72 | 16.7 |
| Turcan Connell | 3 | 18 | 16.7 |
| FFW | 19 | 115 | 16.5 |
| Osborne Clarke | 18 | 112 | 16.1 |
| Ashurst | 31 | 197 | 15.7 |
| Brabners Chaffe | 9 | 58 | 15.5 |
| Clifford Chance | 95 | 613 | 15.5 |
| Stephenson Harwood | 13 | 84 | 15.5 |
| Gordons | 6 | 39 | 15.4 |
| Allen & Overy | 71 | 474 | 15.0 |
| Dickinson Dees | 12 | 81 | 14.8 |
| Links | 77 | 528 | 14.6 |
| Davies Arnold Cooper | 10 | 70 | 14.3 |
| Simmons | 32 | 226 | 14.2 |
| BLG | 11 | 78 | 14.1 |
| WFW | 9 | 66 | 13.6 |
| Herbert Smith | 31 | 229 | 13.5 |
| Speechly Bircham | 8 | 62 | 12.9 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer | 53 | 422 | 12.6 |
| Travers Smith | 8 | 64 | 12.5 |
| Burges Salmon | 8 | 65 | 12.3 |
| Taylor Wessing | 32 | 267 | 12.0 |
| Clydes | 17 | 142 | 12.0 |
| Bircham Dyson | 6 | 51 | 11.8 |
| Howes Percival | 4 | 35 | 11.4 |
| Holman Fenwick Willan | 12 | 106 | 11.3 |
| Ince & Co | 9 | 82 | 11.0 |
| Burness | 4 | 40 | 10.0 |
| Dickson Minto | 1 | 17 | 5.9 |
| TOTALS | 2224.0 | 11387.0 | 19.4 (average) |


Readers' comments (4)
Anonymous | 8-Sep-2008 4:45 pm
Flexible working
What this suggests to me is that law firms are leading the way on flexible working, which means it easier for women to get ahead.
Perhaps, certainly as it relates to more junior employees, this might be because we have a culture of closely monitored billable hours: other types of business are probably more concerned that 'flexible working' could just turn into a euphemism for shirking.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Laura | 8-Sep-2008 4:48 pm
About time
I'm pleased the profession is moving in the right direction, but there's a long way to go. And progress for women isn't helped by the fact that there are more female law graduates than male, but firms opt to take a 50/50 balance of trainees.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Max | 8-Sep-2008 4:53 pm
Hard to believe
Positive discrimination in favour of MEN? Seems hard to believe. HR people: can you confirm or deny?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anon. | 9-Sep-2008 4:56 pm
Hours culture
The reason that it's the UK 100's smaller firms that have more female partners is that they don't have the same exhausting, long-hours culture suffered by those in the magic circle and others.
This isn't a question of talent or of discrimination, it's about whether or not lawyers are able to stay at work till late at night, and as more women that men still look after the kids, fewer can commit in that way as a result.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment