Categories:Litigation / Dispute Resolution
- Home
-
News and Analysis
-
Latest News
-
High Court upholds McAlpine Twitter libel claim against Bercow
-
Linklaters joins CC on Glencore Xstrata's first post-merger bond
-
Eversheds cuts 116 roles following consultation
-
Three jobs for 11 trainees at Dundas in London following zero partner promos
-
KWM names Sue Kench as Australia head as O'Malley stands down
-
-
-
Briefings
- Firms
- In-House
- CPD/Events
- Students
- Jobs



Readers' comments (5)
TheLawMap | 11-Sep-2012 2:13 pm
I can't help but note a sense of achievement in the headline but the profession still has a long way to go in addressing equality issues. What is now needed are more female partners at the top firms. One in six appears to be the present state of being, it needs to be higher!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Nelsonian Eye | 11-Sep-2012 5:57 pm
To chase the figure is meaningless! We only need to maintain a meritorious system. We must not sacrifice the quality of justice we get for some useless figures!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 12-Sep-2012 6:30 am
They must get there on merit, not through a quota system masking low performers.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 12-Sep-2012 10:19 am
Having known Sarah Asplin QC in a professional capacity for some years, I can assure any doubters that she is an excellent lawyer and an excellent judge - a role she has been doing on a part time basis for some time. It is absolutely right that not enough women are breaking through within the judiciary or indeed at the top of law firms, but Sarah Asplin is no 'token'
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 12-Sep-2012 12:12 pm
Agree with all said about Sarah Asplin. That said, this must be one of the less tumescent swellings of recent times.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment