The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A newly-formed alliance of pressure groups set up to campaign against the recent hike in civil court fees, is seeking cases for judicial review to get the increases abolished.
The initiative follows a successful judicial review last March which led to the reintroduction of exemption or remission of High Court and County court fees for people in receipt of income support, and the return of family court fees for people on income support, family credit or the Green Form scheme.
But all other civil court users still have to show undue financial hardship due to exceptional circumstances before any reduction or exemption is granted.
The alliance, made up of the County Court Advisers Group, Federation of Independent Advice Centres, Law Centres Federation, Legal Action group, Money Advice Association, National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux, Public Law Project and Shelter, is campaigning for an abolition of the recent increases and a debate on the way civil courts are funded.
Vicki Chapman, policy officer at the Legal Action Group, said that, as an initial step, the group wanted to see an immediate automatic remission extended to people in receipt of family credit or a disability working allowance.
Details of potentially suitable cases for a judicial review are being sent to Shelter, law centres, independent advice agencies and citizens advice bureaux. Advisers are being asked to monitor applications for remission and any information may be used as evidence for lobbying purposes.
"We anticipate a significant increase in the number of people applying for remission because of the size of the fee increases," said Chapman.