The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Plans by an elite group of universities to introduce entrance tests for their law degrees have been slammed by a leading legal education diversity body.
Last week, Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Durham, East Anglia, Nottingham, Oxford and University College London announced that they plan a compulsory test for their undergraduate law schools from November 2004.
The National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) comprises questions assessing candidates’ ability to make logical deductions from text in formal English and an essay. It will not replace A-levels.
Global Graduates chief operating officer Yolande Beckles expressed fears that the LNAT could adversely affect the diversity of students attending top institutions.
“It’s just another hurdle that disadvantaged kids are going to have to jump over if they want to get into the Russell Group [a group of leading universities],” she stated.
Despite claims by the universities involved that the LNAT is “relatively impervious to coaching”, Beckles said there was always “an element” in any test that could be coached.
“Private schools will train their pupils in how to take the test, and nothing like that will go on in state schools,” she claimed.