Farrers partner 'ordered surveillance' of phone-hacking lawyers

  • Print
  • Comments (13)

Readers' comments (13)

  • Anonymous | 9-Nov-2011 2:28 pm
    I think I made it fairly clear that I don't approve of this behaviour and I think my moral compass is relatively intact. Please can someone explain in rational and non-hysterical terms (ideally without an ad hominem attack thrown in as a bonus) why this is wrong. I'm genuinely interested, as I try and get a grip...
    Anonymous | 8-Nov-2011 7:39 pm

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder if Mark Bridges has been summoned to the Palace to explain Pike's conduct. I shouldn't think Farrer's reprehensible activities would go down too well with Her Maj.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Could this be the end of the road for Farrers.
    Remember Arthur A

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (13)