Ex-Ince partner jailed for fraud faked letters in OBE bid
8 February 2013 | By Katy Dowell
Related Articles
The lawyer, the fraud and the fake OBE application
8 February 2013
Former Ince & Co partner jailed for £3m fraud
7 February 2013
Partners in crime
2 April 2012
Juries/conditional fees. Trial by jury gets a vote of confidence
27 August 1996
Ex-Mishcon partner jailed for five years over fraud
27 January 2012
Related Firms
The former Ince & Co partner jailed yesterday for defrauding the firm attempted to obtain an OBE by faking letters hailing him as a cancer charity hero, it has emerged.
The former global head of energy at the firm, Nathan ‘Andrew’ Iyer, was sentenced to four years and eight months at the Old Bailey yesterday after being found guilty of defrauding the firm and its clients of £2.8m (7 Feburary 2013).
The firm, which first reported Iyer to police in July 2010 (30 July 2010), said yesterday that its clients had been reimbursed.
The lawyer said he had originally taken the money to make ends meet when he was an assistant solicitor, but his spending started to spiral and the theft became habitual. He used the money to buy a racing yacht, flash cars and properties in London and Hampshire. Between September 2009 and June 2010 he spent £600,000 renovating, landscaping and installing a swimming pool at his Hampshire property.
In total, he stole £2.8m from the firm and some of its clients over 12 years.
Iyer became the subect of a fraud squad investigation after the Department of Health (DoH) raised concerns about letters it had received nominating Iyer for an OBE.
The letters came from a woman called Elizabeth Herring, of Wandsworth in London, who claimed to be a “retired cancer research coordinator” who had worked with Iyer. They praised the then solicitor and nominated him for the national honour of an OBE within the field of health and social care.
However, Elizabeth Herring was just one of several fictional characters created by Iyer to help him try to obtain an honour from the Queen.
Iyer’s pseudonymous letters claimed that he had carried out substantial work for cancer charities, including raising £1.8m for Cancer Research UK and donating all the royalties from a book he wrote, which he claimed sold very well, but which in fact made no profit, to the charity. In fact, records showed that Iyer had not donated money from fundraisers or book royalties.
Iyer sent supporting letters to the Cabinet Office under a number of aliases. One came from non-existent cancer sufferer ‘Terry Benjamin’. It told the DoH that lung cancer had stopped the fictitious Terry Benjamin from being able to work and that his insurance company had refused to satisfy his income protection policy to pay 60 per cent of his salary. In the guise of Terry Benjamin, Iyer claimed that he had represented ‘the client’ for free in a legal battle with the insurers, eventually winning him 55 per cent of his salary.
Iyer also wrote to public and legal figures both as Elizabeth Herring and himself, asking for letters of support by claiming that Cancer Research UK was determined to see him honoured but that he needed more recommendations. On several occasions, Iyer even wrote to the DoH as Elizabeth Herring to check on the progress of the application.
In the course of its investigation into the false accounting, the Fraud Squad found that Iyer had typed his letters from the fictional Elizabeth Herring on his computer at the law firm he worked for.
When interviewed about the applications for honours, Iyer told police that he was writing a book on the honours system with a view to showing that it was easy to obtain one falsely.
However, despite allegedly working on the book for four years, he was unable to show any evidence of this and he eventually pleaded guilty to all the charges against him at City of London Magistrates Court on 5 November 2012, following the service of the summons.
Investigating officer DC Mark Cross of the Metropolitan Police’s Central Fraud Squad said: “Iyer displayed an astounding degree of audacity. He abused his position as a solicitor and partner of his law firm to defraud the company and its clients out of millions of pounds, in order that he could live a flash lifestyle. He even faked numerous letters to the Government to try and obtain an accolade he didn’t remotely deserve.
“Iyer showed complete disregard for those he defrauded and a disturbing willingness to use the serious matter of terminal illness to try and win an honour, including by faking a letter from an imaginary cancer sufferer. Iyer’s attempt to fraudulently obtain an honour demonstrates a complete disrespect for those who do merit the award. His sentence is well deserved.”
Iyer was sentenced to four years for false accounting and eight months for two charges of forgery. He was struck off by the SDT last February (7 February 2012).
View results 10 per page | 20 per page


Readers' comments (12)
Rob | 8-Feb-2013 1:48 pm
The ultimate red Herring!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 1:50 pm
So Ince would never have caught him but for the police investigation of the bogus OBE application? It makes you wonder what other instances of disbursement fraud exist in other City firms.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 2:24 pm
What a flipping sociopath this guy is.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Marshall Hall KC | 8-Feb-2013 2:46 pm
Makes you wonder why the SRA haven't taken proceedings against Ince & Co?
If he had been a partner of a small firm of lawyers we all know that they would have hounded out of their jobs, and probably homes, by now...
Clearly SRA are gutless and spineless in dealing with the City Firms...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 2:55 pm
Sociopath is a good term, divorced his wife to protect her assets but lo and behold still living together happily in the same Hampshire home they renovated.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 3:06 pm
Glad to see Incey-wincey Iyer has been washed down the spout, though frankly I think he got off lightly. Whilst this might not seem the most sophisticated of frauds when looked at in hindsight, it does go to show that some of these stunts are quite easy to pull and a lot of reliance is put on the integrity of the profession which guys like this and other recent notable conviction simply undermine. This is why the book should be thrown at them more heavily as, ultimately, it will affect all of us.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 5:16 pm
I thought this would be the bog standard greedy partner fraud until I read the bit about him faking a letter from a 'retired cancer research co-ordinator'. Mind-boggling and in the utmost of bad taste. It's also alarming that he could steal from clients for so long without Ince noticing.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
david | 8-Feb-2013 5:30 pm
It was never about the money with Andy; it was always about the status. Having lied and cheated for relative wealth it makes perfect sense that his next goal was an "honour".
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 6:04 pm
Utterly sad. I remember Andy as a hard working and talented lawyer who had the respect and admiration of his colleagues. He had a charm that brought in clients and worked long hours to deliver. He didn't need to cheat to be successful. It all looks so unsophisticated in hindsight, but he really was not someone you would have suspected. And the OBE thing is just bizarre.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2013 8:11 pm
Is it true that he even dressed as Ms Herring from time to time as part of becomming the lie?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment