Ex-Hogan Lovells partner jailed for three years over £1.27m fraud
30 May 2012 | By James Swift
Related Articles
Ex-Hogan Lovells partner jailed for three years
30 May 2012
Ex Hogan Lovells partner Grierson admits £1.27m expenses fraud
27 March 2012
The ex-Hogan Lovells partner facing jail
27 March 2012
Ex-Hogan Lovells partner struck off for £1.27m fraud
1 November 2012
Playing catch-up
15 November 2004
Those around him thought he was a shining example of a senior partner, always putting clients first and billing prodigious amounts. But today former Hogan Lovells partner Christopher Grierson was jailed for three years after pleading guilty to defrauding his firm of £1.27m.

Chris Grierson
The sentence was delivered after mitigation from Grierson’s defence counsel, QEB Hollis Whiteman’s Mark Ellison QC, who told the court how Grierson had been plagued by mental illness and driven to steal in a bid to maintain a stable home life amid reckless spending.
Grierson, who had been a litigation partner at the firm, began falsifying travel expenses at his firm in 2008, when he made false claims totalling £167,000. A year later this escalated to £526,785 and in 2010 he took £516,785. Last year, before the theft was uncovered, he took £63,611 between January and May.
In Southwark Crown Court this morning he was handed four sentences relating to four counts of fraud, one of 15 months, two of 36 months and one of 12 months, to run concurrently. He will serve half the three year sentence, with the remainder suspended. Grierson was also ordered to pay costs of £1,630.
Mitigating, Ellison told the court how Grierson had suffered from depression for many years and how he threw himself into his work to cope. Partner reviews from legacy firm Lovells between 2001 and 2009 described Grierson as an outstanding litigator with a prodigious workload - he billed 3,500 hours in one year - and “a model of how a senior partner should behave”. But cracks were beginning to show and the firm expressed concerns that Grierson was driving himself too hard – concerns that Grierson dismissed. He later agreed to see a psychiatrist linked to the firm.
Grierson’s state deteriorated when the BCCI case that he had worked on for more than 10 years collapsed in November 2005, leaving him with a sense of loss. In 2007 he was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder by a psychiatrist he had begun seeing.
At the same time, Grierson’s spending was spiralling out of control. The court heard from Ellison how Grierson had begun using prostitutes in 2003, but in 2006 this “entered into a different league” when he became infatuated with a Lebanese woman in New York. Grierson spent £630,000 on the woman, paying her rent and gifting her £280,000 in cash, among other things.
Grierson would later tell his psychiatrist that he knew the relationship was false and that he was a victim of manipulation, perhaps even a willing victim of manipulation.
Grierson began stealing from his firm in 2008 to continue the appearance of normality in his home life. Ellison admitted that Grierson could have solved his financial problems by selling his properties in England and France, but spoke about his desperation to avoid a similar experience to that of a few years before, when Grierson was forced to sell his UK home and downsize, putting strain on his relationship with his wife, with whom he is now in the middle of divorce proceedings.
It was also revealed in court that Grierson was only able to pay back what he had stolen from the firm when a close associate loaned him the money. He was able to pay back the associate following the sale of his property in France earlier this year.
Sentencing, Judge John Price took account of the fact that Grierson’s fraud was “well-planned and sophisticated” and obtained for him substantial sums, but added that the lawyer’s mental illness provided substantial mitigation. He quoted Grierson’s psychiatrist, who said that his illness impaired his judgement to the extent that he committed “social, sexual and financial indiscretions that were bound to be exposed”.
In a statement today, detective chief inspector Perry Stokes from the City of London Police, who led the investigation into Grierson, said: “Christopher Grierson’s greed was his downfall. He abused his status as a well-respected partner within a high profile law firm to steal more than a million pounds from the firm.
“This was a serious breach of trust and once he started offending, it was inevitable that he would come to our notice. The sentence passed today demonstrates how seriously the court views such cases.”
Grierson was dismissed from Hogan Lovells in 2011 after the fraud was detected (17 May 2011). As he had transferred the expenses to a dormant account, no client money had been affected.
The firm reported Grierson, a former equity partner on an annual profit share of more than £700,000, to the police in June 2011 after it recovered the stolen money (3 June 2011).
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page
Have your say
Related CPD/Events
Sign up for CPD/Events alerts-
Are You Complying? - Meeting SRA Requirements - A Compliance Toolkit
MBL Seminars Limited
-
The SRA Accounts Rules - Common Breaches & How to Avoid Them
MBL Seminars Limited
-
PRACTICAL INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL PATENT LAW AND PRACTICE
Management Forum


Readers' comments (38)
Anonymous | 30-May-2012 4:55 pm
"Mentally ill man steals £1.27m and pays it all back. Loses his job, wife and reputation. Gets three years".
Injustice! 50 years! Hang him! Free all the rioters!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Rural Bliss | 30-May-2012 5:37 pm
He's got 3 years, half of which was suspended.
That means he'll be eligible for release after one third of his actual sentence, i.e. after just six months!
In any case, one would have thought that £700k a year would have been enough to finance the hookers and the Lady from Lebanon without having to dip into the petty cash.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-May-2012 8:17 pm
This is a sad case but no-one has mentioned the 3500 chargeable hours year. Working under that pressure is bound to lead to distortions in behaviour. A lesson for many perhaps - the greed element is not the theft but the pressure of City firms to earn more and more, sums that would have been regarded as ridiculous onlyta few years ago. He was apparently the model of what a senior partner should be!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-May-2012 9:13 pm
3500 billable hours a year. Small wonder his life fell apart.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
B Wooster | 30-May-2012 11:05 pm
Rural Bliss | 30-May-2012 5:37 pm - I make about £850,000 p.a. and it's more than enough to cover all pursuits of that nature.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-May-2012 11:47 pm
What a sad situation! Will his lady be waiting for him? He will at least be granted 3yrs of reflection (or half???) and free psychiatric help. No prostitutes will be sneaking into HMP.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-May-2012 9:19 am
What a sad story. I say that as someone who knows the defendant well. If the object of the prosecution process is to exact retribution, it has surely achieved that. He is a sick man, both physically and mentally and will most likely never have a responsible job again. As a complete driven workaholic dedicated to the litigation process, that is probably the greatest punishment that he could endure. I suspect that the 6 months inside will be a walk in the park compared to the years afterwards.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-May-2012 11:02 am
How is Grierson any better than the young woman who decided to go and loot from Currys (her employers) in her uniform during the riots? Both employees stole from their respective employers whilst in work garb. At least the ex-Currys employee had the decency to do her thieving under cover of darkness.
The only difference is that Grierson thought that the normal rules regarding stealing from his employers were suspended for four years rather than four nights.
In her defence, the young woman was not standing in judgement of her colleagues on disciplinary committees whilst on the rob, chowing down in the partner dining room (until one enlightened soul sussed that the hand of Grierson that betrayeth him was with him at the table) and billing 3,500 hours divvying-up Madoff's estate.
Like so many in the City, Grierson had a looter mentality - so why shouldn't the punishment fit the crime?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-May-2012 12:43 pm
This is a sad case (and I would not have said that several weeks ago when I knew less of the detail behind it all). On the face of it he is not deserving of sympathy and the sentence seems light. However, the Court will have had far more information before it than any of us do. Depressive illnesses cause a loss of inhibition and risk-taking. I suspect he always knew - as a talented lawyer - that the game would be up at some point and that part of him wanted that to happen. He is plainly ruined and a broken man. A bit of compassion wouldn't be a bad thing.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-May-2012 12:55 pm
I agree with Anonymous | 30-May-2012 4:55 pm. If he truly has bipolar disorder then he needs psychiatric help and medication, not prison. I suspect those who feel otherwise know nothing of the illness.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment